WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

An Assessment of plankton diversity as an water quality indicator in small man-made reservoirs in the Mzingwane catchment, Limpopo basin, Zimbabwe

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Busane Lefranc Basima
University of Zimbabwe - MSc 2005
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF TABLES x

LIST OF FIGURES xi

LIST OF FIGURES xi

LIST OF ANNEXES xii

I. Introduction 1

1.1 Background 1

1.3 Hypotheses 6

1.4 Objectives 7

II. Materials and Methods 8

2.1 Study area 8

2.1.1 Land and water use in the communal Lands 13

2.1.2 Land and water use in the National Park 15

2.2 Data collection 16

2.2.1 Plankton samples 16

2.2.2 Physical and chemical data 16

2.2.3 Water samples 18

2.3 Data analysis 19

III. Results 20

3.1 Land and water use in the area 20

3.2 Water quality 22

3.3 Plankton community composition 23

3.3.1 Phytoplankton 23

3.1.2 Zooplankton 28

3.1.3 Overall plankton abundance 33

3.1.4 Relationships between physico-chemical parameters and plankton species in
the studied reservoirs 35

IV. Discussion 38

4.1 Water quality aspects, land and water use 38

4.2 Plankton commun ity composition, divers ity and abundance in relation to
land and water use 40

4.2.1 Seasonal variation in plankton diversity and abundance 40

4.2.2 Plankton composition 42

4.2.3 Study limitations 44

4.2.4 Management implications 45

V. Conclusion 46

VI. References 47

Annexes Error! Bookmark flot defifled.

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1. Limpopo basin: areas and rainfall by country 9

Table 2.2. Some characteristics of small reservoir the studied reservoirs in the communal

lands, Insiza district, Zimbabwe. 13
Table 2.3. Rainfall pattern in Filabusi district and Sibasa village area during 2004/2005

(Insiza District) 14
Table 3.1. Littoral soil samples Color, pH and Electro conductivity (uS/cm), water colour

and littoral vegetation score (estimated) 21

Table 3.2. Texture of soils around the studied small reservoirs 21

Table 3.3 Water quality of the studied reservoirs (for April 2005 samples) 22

Table 3.4. Composition and density (ind. l-1) of the phytoplankton in eight reservoirs

located on communal lands and National Park in rural Zimbabwe. 24

Table 3.5. Phytoplankton diversity: number of taxa recorded in the study area 25

Table 3.6. Simpson's diversity index calculated on February and April samples 26

Table 3.7. Abundance of major groups for February samples (no. l-1) 26

Table 3.8. Abundance of major groups for April samples (ind. l-1) 27

Table 3.9. Abundance of zooplankton (no.l-1) for the samples of February and April 29

Table 3.10. Abundance of major zooplankton groups/February 31

Table 3.11. Abundance of major zooplankton groups /April 31

LIST OF FIGURES

Fig. 2.1. Map of the Limpopo basin (from Encarta library 2003) 9

Fig 2. 2. Map of Zimbabwe (from Encarta Library 2003) 10

Fig. 2. 3. Map of the Mzingwane Catchment (Limpopo basin in Zimbabwe) 10

Fig 2.4. Location of the study sites 12

Fig.2.5 Location of reservoirs in the Mzingwane catchment 12

Fig 3.1 Abundance of major groups in February 28

Fig. 3.2 Abundance of major groups in April 28

Fig. 3.3. Zooplankton species distribution and abundance (numbers of zooplankton per litre in the right) among the 8 reservoirs/ February 30
Fig. 3.4. Zooplankton species distribution and abundance (numbers of zooplankton per

litre in right) among the reservoirs/ April 31

Fig. 3.6 Abundance of zooplankton major groups in the study area 33

Fig. 3.9 Clustering of stations according to the overall plankton abundance/ February 34

Fig. 3.10 Clustering of stations according to the overall plankton abundance/ April 35

Fig. 3.11 Relationship between chemistry and zooplankton in the studied reservoirs 36

Fig. 3.12 Relationship between chemistry and phytoplankton in the studied reservoirs 37

LIST OF ANNEXES

Annex 1. Fig. A to F: A. Whitish color of Sibasa reservoir waters; B. Algal bloom in Chitampa reservoir; C. Sibasa reservoir; D. Mpopoma reservoir; E. Maleme reservoir dam wall; F. Dewa reservoir Error! Bookmark not defined.

Annex 2. Fig. G-H-I-J: Littoral and floating dominant vegetation in Mezilume reservoir. G: Polygonum sp., H. Numpheae sp, Cyperus sp. and Ceratophyllum sp.; I: Myriophyllum sp. and J. Numphaea sp. Error! Bookmark not defined.

Annex 3. Fig. K-P. Examples of phytoplankton taxa identified. K: Rhizosolenia; L: Anabaena; M: Ceratium; N: Pediastrum; O: Phacus; P: Micrasterias sp Error! Bookmark not defined.

Annex 4. Fig. Q-V. Examples of Zooplankton taxa identified. Q: the rotifer Brachionus sp.; R: the cladoceran Bosmina sp.; S: a cladoceran (Daphnia???); T: the rotifer Keratella sp.; U: the copepod Cyclops sp.; V: the rotifer Keratella sp. Error! Bookmark not defined.

Annex 5. Water colors influence. Analysis of variance (combiapr.sta) Marked effects are

significant at p< 0.05) Error! Bookmark not defined.
Annex 6. Influence of soil classes. Analysis of variance (combiapr.sta) Marked effects

are significant at p< 0.05) Error! Bookmark not defined.

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Entre deux mots il faut choisir le moindre"   Paul Valery