WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

La main à  la pàte. Des théories naïves aux concepts scientifiques : un apport de l’inhibition ?


par Justine LefàƒÂ¨vre
Université de Paris - Master Psychologie cognitive et sociale de l'enfant et de l'adolescent 2016
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Extinction Rebellion

Bibliographie

Asoko, H. (2002). Developing Conceptual Understanding in Primary Science. Cambridge Journal Of Education, 32 (2), 153-164.

Borst, G., Cachia, A., Vidal., J., Simon, G., Fischer, C., Pineau, A., Poirel, N., Mangin, J.-F., & Houdé, O. (2014). Folding of the anterior cingulate cortex partially explains inhibitory control during childhood: A longitudinal study. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 126-135.

Borst, G., Poirel, N., Pineau, A., Cassotti, M., & Houdé, O. (2013). Inhibitory control efficiency in a Piaget-like class-inclusion task in school-age children and adults: A developmental negative priming study. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1366-1374.

Borst, G., Ahr, E., Roell, M., & Houdé, O. (2015). The cost of blocking the mirror generalization process in reading: evidence for the role of inhibitory control in discriminating letters with lateral mirror-image counterparts. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 22 (1), 228-234.

Chase, W. G., & Ericsson, K. A. (1982). Skill and working memory. Psychology of learning and motivation, 16, 1-58

Cremin, T., Glauert, E., Craft, A., Compton, A., & Stylianidou, F. (2015). Creative Little Scientists: exploring pedagogical synergies between inquiry-based and creative approaches in Early Years. Science Education, 3 (13), 1-16.

Dantier, B. (2004). Gaston Bachelard, les obstacles épistémologiques. Repéré à : http://classiques.uqac.ca/collection_methodologie/bachelard_gaston/obstacles_epist emologiques/obstacles_epistemologiques.doc.

De Neys, W., Lubin, A., & Houdé, O. (2014). The smart nonconserver: Preschoolers detect their number conservation errors. Child Development Research, 2014.

32

Diamond, A., Barnett, W. S., Thomas, J., & Munro, S. (2007). Education Forum. Science, 318 (5855), 1387-1388.

Dreyfus, A., Jungwirth, E. & Eliovitch, R. (1990) Applying the cognitive conflict strategy for conceptual change-some implications, difficulties and problems, Science Education, 74 (5), 555 - 569.

Equipe La main à la pâte (2012). Historique de la fondation La main à la pâte. Repéré à : http://www.fondation-lamap.org/node/14607

Erickson, G. L. (1979). Children's conceptions of heat and temperature. Science Education, 63 (2), 221-230.

Festinger, L. (1962). Cognitive Dissonance. Scientific American, 207, 93-106.

Gil-Perez, D., & Carrascosa, J. (1990). What to do about science `misconceptions'. Science Education, 74 (5), 531-540.

Hewson, M. G., & Hewson P. W. (1984). Effect of instruction using students prior knowledge and conceptual strategies on science learning. European Journal of Science Education, 6 (1). 1-6.

Houdé, O. (1997). Numerical development: From the infant to the child. Wynn's (1992) paradigm in 2-and 3-year olds. Cognitive Development, 12 (3), 373-391.

Houdé, O. (2000). Inhibition and cognitive development: Object, number, categorization, and reasoning. Cognitive Development, 15 (1), 63-73.

Houdé, O., Zago, L., Mellet, E., Moutier, S., Pineau, A., Mazoyer, B. et Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2000). Shifting from the perceptual brain to the logical brain: the neural impact of cognitive inhibition training. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 (5), 721-728.

Houdé, O. (2014). Le raisonnement. Paris : Presses universitaires de France.

33

Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2015). Evidence for an inhibitory-control theory of the reasoning brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 148.

Houdé, O., & Moutier, S. (1996). Deductive reasoning and experimental inhibition training: The case of the matching bias. Cahiers de psychologie cognitive, 15 (4), 409-434.

Lanoë, C., Vidal, J., Lubin, A., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2016). Inhibitory control is needed to overcome written verb inflection errors: Evidence from a developmental negative priming study. Cognitive Development, 37, 18-27.

Lautrey, J., & Caroff, X. (1999). Une approche pluraliste du développement cognitif : La conservation « revisitée ». In G. Netchine-Grynberg, Développement et

fonctionnement cognitifs chez l'enfant, 155-179.

Lee, G., Kwon, J., Park, S. S., Kim, J. W., Kwon, H. G., & Park, H. K. (2003). Development of an instrument for measuring cognitive conflict in secondary-level science classes. Journal of research in science teaching, 40 (6), 585-603.

Lee, G., & Yi, J. (2013). Where cognitive conflict arises from? The structure of creating cognitive conflict. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11 (3), 601-623.

Linzarini, A., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2015). When Stroop helps Piaget: An inter-task positive priming paradigm in 9-year-old children. Journal of experimental child psychology, 139, 71-82.

Lubin, A., Lanoë, C., Pineau, A., & Rossi, S. (2012). Apprendre à inhiber : Une pédagogie innovante au service des apprentissages scolaires fondamentaux (mathématiques et orthographe) chez des élèves de 6 à 11 ans. Neuroéducation, 1, 55-84.

34

Lubin, A., Poirel, N., Rossi, S., Lanoë, C., Pineau, A., & Houdé, O. (2009). Pedagogical effect of action on arithmetic performances in Wynn-like tasks solved by 2-year-olds. Experimental psychology, 57(6), 405-411.

Lubin, A., Vidal, J., Lanoë, C., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2013). Inhibitory control is needed for the resolution of arithmetic word problems: A developmental negative priming study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105 (3), 701-709.

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational psychologist, 41 (2), 75-86.

Masson, S., & Foisy, L. M. B. (2012). Les conceptions erronées des élèves en électricité ne disparaissent peut-être jamais de leur cerveau. Spectre, 42 (1), 15-17.

Masson, S., Potvin, P., Riopel, M., & Foisy, L. M. B. (2014). Differences in brain activation between novices and experts in science during a task involving a common misconception in electricity. Mind, Brain, and Education, 8(1), 44-55.

Matlen, B. J., & Klahr, D. (2013). Sequential effects of high and low instructional guidance on children's acquisition of experimentation skills: Is it all in the timing? Instructional Science, 41 (3), 621-634.

Megalakaki, O., & Labrell, F. (2009). Les conceptions naïves : connaissances organisées, bases des changements conceptuels. Psychologie française, 54 (1), 1-9.

Moutier, S. (2000). Deductive reasoning and experimental matching-bias inhibition training in school children. Current Psychology of Cognition, 19, 429-452.

Moutier, S., Angeard, N., & Houdé, O. (2002). Deductive reasoning and matching-bias inhibition training: Evidence from a debiasing paradigm. Thinking & reasoning, 8 (3), 205-224.

35

Piaget, J. (1970). Psychologie et épistémologie. Paris : Éditions Gonthier.

Piaget, J. (1975). L'équilibration des structures cognitives : problème central du développement (Vol. 33). Presses universitaires de France.

Piaget, J. (1969). Psychologie et pédagogie. Paris: Gallimard.

Poirel, N., Borst, G., Simon, G., Rossi, S., Cassotti, M., Pineau, A., & Houdé, O. (2012). Number conservation is related to children's prefrontal inhibitory control: an fMRI study of a Piagetian task. PloS one, 7(7), e40802.

Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science education, 66 (2), 211-227.

Potvin, P., Masson, S., Lafortune, S., & Cyr, G. (2015). Persistence of the intuitive conception that heavier objects sink more: A reaction time study with different levels of interference. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 21-43.

Potvin, P., Sauriol, É., & Riopel, M. (2015). Experimental evidence of the superiority of the prevalence model of conceptual change over the classical models and repetition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(8), 1082-1108.

Sever, D., & Güven, M. (2014). Effect of Inquiry-based Learning Approach on Student Resistance in a Science and Technology Course. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14 (4), 1601-1605.

Shleifer, A. (2012). Psychologists at the Gate: A Review of Daniel Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow. Journal Of Economic Literature, 50 (4), 1080-1091.

Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of experimental psychology, 18(6), 643-662.

36

Simon, G., Lubin, A., Houdé, O., & De Neys, W. (2015). Anterior cingulate cortex and

intuitive bias detection during number conservation. Cognitive neuroscience, 1-11. Thouin, M. (1985). Les représentations de concepts en sciences physiques chez les jeunes.

Revue des sciences de l'éducation, 11 (2), 247-258.

Tiberghien, A. (1998). Connecting research in physics education with teacher education. International Commission on Physics Education. Repéré à : http://kdfls1.troja.mff.cuni.cz/publications/teach1/ConnectingResInPhysEducWithT eacherEduc_Vol_1.pdf.

Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37 (4), 571-590.

Wu, J. W., Tseng, J. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2015). Development of an Inquiry-Based Learning Support System Based on an Intelligent Knowledge Exploration Approach. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18 (3), 282-300.

Wynn, K. (1992). Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 358 (6389), 749750.

37

précédent sommaire suivant






Extinction Rebellion





Changeons ce systeme injuste, Soyez votre propre syndic





"Je voudrais vivre pour étudier, non pas étudier pour vivre"   Francis Bacon