WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

The effectiveness of graphic organizers and Baxendell's guiding principles for instructional practices with special needs students

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Milien Yvon
The School of Education, The City College, The City University of New York - Master of Science in Education  2004
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

REFERENECES

Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.

Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 267-272.

Alvermann, D. E. (1982). Restructuring text facilitates written recall of main ideas. Journal of

reading, 25, 754 - 758.

Alvermann, D. E. & Boothby, P. R. (1983). A preliminary investigation of the differences in

children's retention of «inconsiderate» text. Reading psychology, 4, 237 - 246.

Baxendell, W. B. (2003). Consistency, coherent, creative: the 3 c' s of graphic organizers. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 35(3), 46-53.

Bromley, K., Irwin-DeVitis, L., & Modlo, M. (1995). Graphic organizers: Visual strategies for

active learning. New York: Scholastic Professional Books.

Bergerud, D. Lowitt, T. C., & Horton, S. V. (1988), The effectiveness of textbook adaptations in

life science for high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning

Disabilities, 21(2), 70-76.

Deshler, D. D. (1978). Psychological aspects of learning disabled adolescents. In L. Mann, L. Goodman, & J.L. Wiederholt (Ed.), Teaching the learning-disabled adolescent (pp. 47- 74): Boston: Houghton Miffin.

Darch, C., & Carnine, D. (1986). Teaching content area material to learning disabled students. Exceptional Children, 53, 240-246.

Fountas, I. C., & Pinnell. G. S. (2001). Guiding readers and writers grades 3-6: Teaching comprehension, genre, and content literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Fisher, J. B., & Schumaker, J. B. (1995). Searching for validated inclusive practices: A review

of the literature. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28,4, 1-20.

Fearon, G. (2001). Pre-Algebra. Pearson Prentice Hall, Inc., New Jersey

Guastello, E. F. Beasley, T. M., & Sinatra. R. C. (2000). Concept mapping effects on science content comprehension and recall of expository texts. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 11, 73-89.

Griffin, C. C., Malone, L. D., & Kameenui, E. J. (1995). Effects of graphic organizer instruction on fifth-grade students. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 98-107.

Griffin, C.C., & Tulbert, B. L. (1995). The effect of graphic organizers on students' comprehension and recall of expository texts. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 11, 73-89.

Horton, V. S., Lovitt, C. T., & Bergerud, D. (2001). The effectiveness of graphic organizers for three classifications of secondary students in content area classes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 12-29.

Herber, H. L., & Riley, J. D. (Eds.). (1979). Research in reading in the content areas: Fourth year

report. Syracuse, NY: University of Syracuse Reading and Language Arts Center.

Herber, H. L., & Sanders, P.L. (Eds.). (1969). Research in reading in the content areas: First

year report, Syracuse, NY: University of Syracuse Reading and Language Arts Center.

Heber, H. L., & Vacca, R. T. (Eds.). (1977). Research in reading in the content areas: Third year

report. Syracuse, NY: University of Syracuse Reading and Language Arts Center.

Jitendra, A. K., Hoff, K., & Beck, M. M. (1999). Teaching middle school students with learning disabilities to solve word problems using a schema-based approach. Remedial and

Special Education, 20, 50-64.

McEneany, J. E. (1990). Do advance organizers facilitate learning? A review of sub-sumption

theory. Journal of research and Development in Education, 23, 89-96.

Moore, D. W., & Readence, J. F. (1984). A quantitative and qualitative review of graphic organizer research. Journal of Educational Research, 78, 11-17.

Smith, D. D., & Luckasson, R. (1992). Introduction to Special Education Teaching in the Age of

Challenge. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Seymour, R. (1988). Earth Science Workshop 1. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

Torgesen J. K. (1985). Memory process in reading disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 350-357.

Zigmond, N., Vallecorsa, A., & Leinhardt, G. (1980). Reading instruction for students with learning disabilities. Topics in Language Disorders, 1, 89-98.

--------(2003). New York State Alternate Assessment Teacher' s Guide. Revised September.

--------(1999). Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1975, Pub. L. No. 105-17, Federal

Register, Vol. 64. 48.

.

.

APPENDICES

Appendix A

Rubric

The study's scoring rubric has one dimension: Performance (including level of accuracy in focusing on relevant information, building connections, integrating new information, and level of independence in completing graphic organizers).

PERFORMANCE IN USING GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS

SCORE

4

3

2

1

Level of Accuracy in Focusing on Relevant Information in the Text

The student

demonstrates skills in choosing relevant information (either most significant, or revealing some pattern) with an average of 80-100% accuracy.

The student

demonstrates skills in choosing relevant information (either most significant, or revealing some pattern) with an average of 60-79% accuracy.

The student

demonstrates skills in choosing relevant information (either most significant, or revealing some pattern) with an average of 30-59% accuracy.

The student

demonstrates skills in choosing relevant information (either most significant, or revealing some pattern) with an average of 0-29% accuracy.

Level of Accuracy in Building Connections

Among Ideas in the Text

The Student demonstrates

skills in Building connections among ideas with an average of 80-100% accuracy.

The Student demonstrates

skills in Building connections among ideas with an average of 60-79% accuracy.

The Student demonstrates skills in Building connections among ideas with an average of 30-59% accuracy.

The Student demonstrates skills in Building connections among ideas with an average of 0-29% accuracy.

Level of Accuracy Integrating New Information

The student demonstrates

skills in integrating new information with an average of 80-100% accuracy.

The student demonstrates

skills in integrating new information with an average of 60-79% accuracy.

The student demonstrates skills in integrating new information with an average of 30-59% accuracy.

The student demonstrates skills in integrating new information with an average of 0-29% accuracy.

Perform

Independently

The student seldom requires cues or prompts when completing graphic organizers.

(80-100% Independence)

The student requires limited cues or prompts when completing graphic organizers.

(60-79% Independence)

The student requires extensive cues or prompts when completing graphic organizers.

(30-59% Independence)

The student requires constant cues or prompts when completing graphic organizers.

(0-29% Independence)

Comments:

Source: NYSAA, 2003

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Un démenti, si pauvre qu'il soit, rassure les sots et déroute les incrédules"   Talleyrand