Table 2
Performance without the use of graphic organizers -
Science
|
Case 1
|
Case 2
|
Case 3
|
Case 4
|
Case 5
|
Case 6
|
Case 7
|
Case 8
|
Case 9
|
Case 10
|
Case 11
|
Case 12
|
|
%
|
Rat*
|
%
|
Rat
|
%
|
Rat
|
%
|
Rat
|
%
|
Rat
|
%
|
Rat
|
%
|
Rat
|
%
|
Rat
|
%
|
Rat
|
%
|
Rat
|
%
|
Rat
|
%
|
Rat
|
|
Level of Accuracy in relevant Information
|
---
|
---
|
55
|
2
|
55
|
2
|
55
|
2
|
45
|
2
|
35
|
2
|
55
|
2
|
20
|
1
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Level of Accuracy in building Connections
|
---
|
---
|
25
|
1
|
55
|
2
|
30
|
2
|
25
|
1
|
25
|
1
|
40
|
2
|
10
|
1
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Level of Accuracy in integrating new Information
|
---
|
---
|
30
|
1
|
45
|
2
|
25
|
1
|
10
|
1
|
35
|
1
|
35
|
2
|
5
|
1
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
|
Level of Independence
|
---
|
---
|
10
|
1
|
40
|
2
|
15
|
1
|
5
|
1
|
20
|
1
|
20
|
1
|
5
|
1
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
---
|
*Rat = Rating
The performance without graphic organizers by students, as shown
by Table 1 and 2, was low on average for both Mathematics and Science. Out of
the 12 participants, only 3 students scored 3 for level of accuracy in focusing
on relevant information in the exercise as shown in Table 1. They scored lower
for level of accuracy in building connections among ideas and integrating new
information. Their lowest score was 1 for performing independently. The
majority of the students scored 1 at the other levels including independent
performance. The majority of students scored 2 for level of accuracy in
focusing on relevant information in the text, and the majority of students
scored 1 at the other levels including independent performance as shown by
Table 2.
Demographic Characteristics
| 
