Bibliographie
1) Amade-Escot C.(2007). Le
didactique, In Collection Pour l'action, Paris : Edition Revue
EPS.
2) Bandura A. (1986). Social Foundations
of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, In Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3) Bollen K., & Hoyle H. (1990).
Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical exarnination, In Social
Forces 69. pp. 419-504.
4) Boone K., Beitel P & Kuhlman J-S.
(1997). The effects of the win/loss record on cohesion, In
Journal of Sport Behavior 20. pp. 125-134.
5) Carron A., Widmeyer W. N., & Brawley
L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport
teams : The Group Environment Questionnaire, In Journal of Sport
Psychology 7. pp. 244-266.
6) Carron A., & Hausenblas H. A. (1998).
Group dynamics, In Fitness Information Technology. Sport
(2nd. Ed.).Morgantown.
7) Carron A., & Brawley L. R. (2000).
Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues, In Small Group
Research 31. pp. 89-106.
8) Carron A., Brawley L. R., and Widmeyer, W.
N. (2002). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups, In J.
L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measuremen. pp.
213-226
9) Carron A. V., Brawley L. R., EYS M. A.,
Bray S., Dorsch K., Estabrouks P., Hall C. R., Hardy J., Hausenblas H., Madison
R., Pasqkevich D., Patterson M. M., Prapavessis H., Spink K. S., & Terry P.
C. (2003). Do individual perceptions of group cohesion reflect shared
beliefs?. An empirical analysis. Small Group Research 34. pp. 468-496.
10) Caron A., Colman M. M., Wheeler J., &
Stevens D. (2006). Cohesion and performance, In A meta-analysis.
Journal of Sport. Exercise Psychology 24.pp. 168-188.
11) Chang A., and Bordia P. (2001). A
multidimensional approach to the group cohesion-group performance
relationship, In Small Group Research 32. pp. 379-405.
12) Festinger L., Schachter S., & Back K.
(1950). Social pressure, In Informal groups. New-York: Harper and
Brothers.
13) Heuzé J-P., and Fontayne P.
(2002). Questionnaire sur l'Ambiance du Groupe : A French-Langage
Instrument for the Mea surement of Group Cohésion, In Journal
of Sport and Exercice Psychology 24. pp.42-67.
14) Hogg M. A., and Hardie E. A. (1991).
« Social attraction, personal attraction, and self
categorization: A field study», In Personality and Social
Psychological Bulletin 17. pp. 175-180.
15) Kozub S. A., and Mcdonnell J. F. (2000).
Exploring the relationship between cohesion and collective efficacy in
rugby teams, In Journal of Sport Behavior 23. pp. 120-129.
16) Locke E.A. and Latham G.P. (1990). A
theory of goal setting and task performance, In Englewood Cliffs,
N.J., Prentice-Hall 17. pp.69-75.
17) Locke E.A., K.N. Shaw L.M. Saari et G.P.
Latham (1981). Goal setting and task performance, In
Psychological Bulletin 01. pp. 125-152.
18) Len S., Berthelot G., Thibault V., &
Toussaint J-F (2009). Bilan des performances à Pékin, In
Beijing 2008. Insights in Olympic and Paralympic Sport Performance, In
(Pékin 2008 Regards croisés sur la performance sportive
olympique et paralympique). pp. 259-263. Paris : Éditions de
l'INSEP.
19) Mercier A., Schubauer-Leoni M.L., et
Sensevy G. (2002). Vers une didactique comparé, In Revue
française de Pédagogie, numéro spéciale «vers
une didactique comparé», 141 pp.5-16.
20) Mullen B., and Cooper C. (1994). The
relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration, In
Psychological Bulletin 115. pp. 210-227.
21) Motowidlo S.J. (2003). Job
performance, dans Handbook of Pyschology, Industrial and
Organizational Psychology, sous la direction de Borman W.C., Ilgen D.R.,
Klimoski R.J ., Weiner I.B., Hoboken NJ 12. pp. 39-52.
22) Mento A.J., Steel R.P et Karren R.J
(1987). A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task
performance, In Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes 39. pp. 52-83.
23) Mitchell T.R. et Daniels D (2003).
Motivation, dans Handbook of Psychology, Industrial and
Organizational Psychology, sous la direction de W.C Borman D.R., Klimoski
R.J., Weiner I.B., et Hoboken NJ 12. pp. 225-254.
24) Paskevich D. M., Brawley L. R., Dorsch K.
D., & Widmeyer W. N. (1999). Relationship between collective efficacy
and team cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Group Dynamics:
Theory, Research, and Practice 3. pp. 210-222.
25) Porter L.W. et E.E. Lawler (1968).
Managerial attitudes and performance. Edition Homewood, Ill. Irwin.
26) Saari L. et Judge T (2004). Employee
attitudes and job satisfaction, In HumanResource Management
43. pp. 395-407.
27) Terrisse A (2001). «Didactique des
disciplines : les references au savoir».Bruxelles: De boeck.
28) Tubbs M.E. (1994). Commitment and the
role of ability in motivation: comment on Wright, O'Leary-Kelly,
Cortina, Klein et Hollenbeck, In Journal of Applied Psychology 79.
pp. 804-811.
29) TURNER, J. C., HOGG, M. A., OAKES, P. J.,
REICHER, S. D., & WETHERELL, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group:
A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK : Blackwell.
30) Widmeyer W. N., Brawley L. R., &
Carron A. V. (1985). The measurement of cohesion in sport teams: the
Group Environment Questionnaire. London, ON: Sports Dynamics.
31) Wright T.A. et., Bonett D.G (2002).
The moderating effects of employee tenure on the relation between
organizational commitment and job performance: a meta analysis,
In Journal of Applied Psychology 87. pp. 1183-1190.
32) Zaccaro S. J., & Lowe C. (1988).
Cohesiveness and performance in an additive task: Evidence for
multidimensionality, In Journal of Social Psychology 128. pp.,
547-58.
33) Zaccaro S-J., & MCCOY M. C. (1988).
The effects of task and interpersonal cohesiveness on performance of a
disjunctive group task, In Journal of Applied Psychology 18. pp.
837-851.
| 
