WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Déterminants de la malnutrition dans les pays en développement

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Djadou Dosseh et Ilboudo Patrick
Cerdi - M.D in Health Economics 2006
  

précédent sommaire

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

Amy L. Rice et al. La malnutrition: cause sous-jacente des décès de l'enfant par maladies infectieuses dans les pays en développement, 2000

B. Arzel et al. Malnutrition et inégalités sociales, 2005

Claudio Araujo, Jean François Brun et Jean Louis combes. Econométrie (repères, cours et application), 2004

Dominique and Jonathan Haughton. Explaining child nutrition in Vietnam, 1997

Haddad and Oshaug. How Does the Human Rights Perspective Help to Shape the Food and Nutrition Policy Research Agenda? 1998

Kangni Kpodar, Manuel d'initiation à Stata (Version 8), Janvier 2005

Monica Das Gupta. Improving child nutrition outcomes in India, 2005

ANNEXES

xtreg chmal safew femsed des gdp democ var1 var2,re

Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 179

Group variable (i): id Number of groups = 63

R-sq: within = 0.4078 Obs per group: min = 2

between = 0.4065 avg = 2.8

overall = 0.4062 max = 5

Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(7) = 115.64

corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

chmal | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------

safew | -.0729228 .0374185 -1.95 0.051 -.1462617 .0004162

femsed | -.1405696 .0548179 -2.56 0.010 -.2480107 -.0331285

des | -.0528704 .021092 -2.51 0.012 -.09421 -.0115308

gdp | -.0052844 .0017472 -3.02 0.002 -.008709 -.0018599

democ | -.4826657 .4270883 -1.13 0.258 -1.319743 .3544119

var1 | 9.28e-06 4.33e-06 2.14 0.032 7.82e-07 .0000178

var2 | 4.72e-07 1.76e-07 2.69 0.007 1.28e-07 8.16e-07

_cons | 114.9489 25.18242 4.56 0.000 65.59229 164.3056

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------

sigma_u | 10.635114

sigma_e | 4.4335881

rho | .85194069 (fraction of variance due to u_i)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table 1: statistiques descriptives

Variable | Mean Std. Dev. Min Max | Observations

-----------------+--------------------------------------------+----------------

chmal overall | 24.62522 15.04972 .9 71.3 | N = 179

between | 14.26103 1.65 66.15 | n = 63

within | 4.535403 10.53722 38.71322 | T-bar = 2.84127

| |

safew overall | 56.17655 23.67131 6 100 | N = 179

between | 21.47801 15.5 99 | n = 63

within | 10.25317 29.17655 87.92655 | T-bar = 2.84127

| |

femsed overall | 33.85494 22.47135 2.5 88 | N = 179

between | 21.60507 3.7 81.54 | n = 63

within | 6.871134 12.05494 53.55494 | T-bar = 2.84127

| |

des overall | 2360.017 331.2081 1592 3284 | N = 179

between | 308.453 1676 3084.5 | n = 63

within | 126.191 1953.017 2778.017 | T-bar = 2.84127

| |

gdp overall | 2305.518 1779.101 305.67 8611.6 | N = 179

between | 1683.671 341.015 6739.525 | n = 63

within | 438.9313 897.8685 5046.463 | T-bar = 2.84127

| |

democ overall | 3.51676 1.673404 1 7 | N = 179

between | 1.494365 1 6.875 | n = 63

within | .7734626 1.01676 6.26676 | T-bar = 2.84127

| |

var1 overall | 5678765 1632458 2534464 1.08e+07 | N = 179

between | 1514901 2816032 9559571 | n = 63

within | 619395.1 3577556 7803239 | T-bar = 2.84127

| |

var2 overall | 8462935 1.26e+07 93434.16 7.42e+07 | N = 179

between | 1.12e+07 117540.5 4.56e+07 | n = 63

within | 4780719 -7094668 4.56e+07 | T-bar = 2.84127

Tableau a

Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 179

Group variable (i): id Number of groups = 63

R-sq: within = 0.3824 Obs per group: min = 2

between = 0.5043 avg = 2.8

overall = 0.5062 max = 5

Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(8) = 129.69

corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

chmal | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------

safew | -.0615283 .0377593 -1.63 0.103 -.1355351 .0124785

femsed | -.1579551 .0546584 -2.89 0.004 -.2650835 -.0508267

des | -.0501669 .0211588 -2.37 0.018 -.0916373 -.0086964

gdp | -.0068795 .0017638 -3.90 0.000 -.0103365 -.0034226

democ | -.6246848 .4320048 -1.45 0.148 -1.471399 .222029

Ass | -7.863557 2.652675 -2.96 0.003 -13.0627 -2.664409

var1 | 8.81e-06 4.34e-06 2.03 0.042 3.04e-07 .0000173

var2 | 6.09e-07 1.79e-07 3.41 0.001 2.59e-07 9.59e-07

_cons | 117.019 25.31839 4.62 0.000 67.39584 166.6421

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------

sigma_u | 9.4628794

sigma_e | 4.4431958

rho | .81935825 (fraction of variance due to u_i)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tableau b

Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 179

Group variable (i): id Number of groups = 63

R-sq: within = 0.4082 Obs per group: min = 2

between = 0.7033 avg = 2.8

overall = 0.6962 max = 5

Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(8) = 216.40

corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

chmal | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------

safew | -.0634679 .0351803 -1.80 0.071 -.13242 .0054841

femsed | -.1672294 .0484569 -3.45 0.001 -.2622032 -.0722556

des | -.0591712 .0198586 -2.98 0.003 -.0980934 -.0202491

gdp | -.0040248 .0015262 -2.64 0.008 -.007016 -.0010335

democ | -.2124011 .4018657 -0.53 0.597 -1.000043 .5752411

asie | 19.46549 2.514976 7.74 0.000 14.53623 24.39475

var1 | .0000106 4.06e-06 2.61 0.009 2.62e-06 .0000185

var2 | 3.75e-07 1.62e-07 2.32 0.020 5.84e-08 6.92e-07

_cons | 115.7883 23.67189 4.89 0.000 69.3922 162.1843

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------

sigma_u | 7.3908877

sigma_e | 4.4335881

rho | .73537703 (fraction of variance due to u_i)

Tableau c

Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 179

Group variable (i): id Number of groups = 63

R-sq: within = 0.4061 Obs per group: min = 2

between = 0.4223 avg = 2.8

overall = 0.4206 max = 5

Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(8) = 116.75

corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

chmal | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------

safew | -.0756199 .0375299 -2.01 0.044 -.1491772 -.0020627

femsed | -.1344177 .0551019 -2.44 0.015 -.2424154 -.0264201

des | -.0519027 .0211213 -2.46 0.014 -.0932996 -.0105058

gdp | -.0044597 .0019226 -2.32 0.020 -.0082278 -.0006916

democ | -.3786569 .4388791 -0.86 0.388 -1.238844 .4815304

amer | -3.808827 3.685886 -1.03 0.301 -11.03303 3.415377

var1 | 8.93e-06 4.35e-06 2.05 0.040 4.08e-07 .0000175

var2 | 4.06e-07 1.87e-07 2.17 0.030 3.99e-08 7.73e-07

_cons | 113.9466 25.21165 4.52 0.000 64.53268 163.3605

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------

sigma_u | 10.597076

sigma_e | 4.4335881

rho | .85103449 (fraction of variance due to u_i)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Test joint pour les diffétences régionales

Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 179

Group variable (i): id Number of groups = 63

R-sq: within = 0.4100 Obs per group: min = 2

between = 0.7040 avg = 2.8

overall = 0.7007 max = 5

Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(10) = 213.99

corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

chmal | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------

safew | -.0604726 .0355092 -1.70 0.089 -.1300693 .0091242

femsed | -.1742798 .0493862 -3.53 0.000 -.2710751 -.0774846

des | -.0603856 .0200467 -3.01 0.003 -.0996765 -.0210947

gdp | -.0046053 .0017075 -2.70 0.007 -.007952 -.0012586

democ | -.3048312 .4159567 -0.73 0.464 -1.120091 .5104289

var1 | .0000109 4.12e-06 2.66 0.008 2.87e-06 .000019

var2 | 4.23e-07 1.74e-07 2.43 0.015 8.22e-08 7.64e-07

Ass | -.1241447 2.923945 -0.04 0.966 -5.854971 5.606681

asie | 20.08716 3.390911 5.92 0.000 13.44109 26.73322

amer | 2.390122 3.401495 0.70 0.482 -4.276685 9.056929

_cons | 117.12 23.77698 4.93 0.000 70.51799 163.722

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------

sigma_u | 7.5018673

sigma_e | 4.4431958

rho | .74030533 (fraction of variance due to u_i)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

test Ass asie amer

( 1) Ass = 0

( 2) asie = 0

( 3) amer = 0

chi2( 3) = 59.33

Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

Tableau d: Les seuils de prévalence de la malnutrition

 

 

Prévalence de la malnutrition

 

 

faible

Moyenne

élevée

très élevée

Retard de croissance

< 2O

20--29

30--39

= 40

Insuffisance pondérale

< 10

10--19

20--29

= 30

Emaciation

< 5

5--9

10--14

= 15

Source: OMS,1997 : http//www.who.int/nutgrowthdb/about/introduction/en/print.html

Tentatives d'instrumentation des variables des et gdp

xtreg des desr femsed safew gdp democ var1 var2,re

Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 116

Group variable (i): id Number of groups = 63

R-sq: within = 0.9908 Obs per group: min = 1

between = 0.9926 avg = 1.8

overall = 0.9934 max = 4

Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(7) = 13320.72

corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

des | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------

desr | -.0271257 .0104588 -2.59 0.009 -.0476245 -.0066269

femsed | -.1765366 .188886 -0.93 0.350 -.5467465 .1936732

safew | .1583751 .1351922 1.17 0.241 -.1065967 .4233469

gdp | .0126273 .0057275 2.20 0.027 .0014017 .023853

democ | 4.002892 1.456974 2.75 0.006 1.147276 6.858508

var1 | .0002028 2.57e-06 78.97 0.000 .0001977 .0002078

var2 | -1.56e-06 5.22e-07 -2.98 0.003 -2.58e-06 -5.33e-07

_cons | 1236.222 20.44502 60.47 0.000 1196.151 1276.294

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------

sigma_u | 29.848202

sigma_e | 10.717996

rho | .88578594 (fraction of variance due to u_i)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

predict res2,e

(63 missing values generated)

xtreg gdp gdpr femsed safew democ var1 var2,re

Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 116

Group variable (i): id Number of groups = 63

R-sq: within = 0.9148 Obs per group: min = 1

between = 0.9848 avg = 1.8

overall = 0.9819 max = 4

Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(6) = 3168.20

corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gdp | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------

gdpr | .3898027 .0355982 10.95 0.000 .3200315 .4595739

femsed | 5.927072 1.937253 3.06 0.002 2.130126 9.724019

safew | 2.702005 1.721878 1.57 0.117 -.6728128 6.076823

democ | -14.56549 18.81409 -0.77 0.439 -51.44043 22.30945

var1 | .0000678 .0000242 2.80 0.005 .0000203 .0001153

var2 | .0000745 3.26e-06 22.86 0.000 .0000681 .0000809

_cons | 104.5504 138.3647 0.76 0.450 -166.6395 375.7404

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------

sigma_u | 196.83002

sigma_e | 138.10355

rho | .67010796 (fraction of variance due to u_i)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

predict res1,e

(63 missing values generated)

xtreg chmal safew femsed des gdp democ var1 var2 res2 res1,re

Random-effects GLS regression Number of obs = 116

Group variable (i): id Number of groups = 63

R-sq: within = 0.1272 Obs per group: min = 1

between = 0.4909 avg = 1.8

overall = 0.4720 max = 4

Random effects u_i ~ Gaussian Wald chi2(9) = 64.24

corr(u_i, X) = 0 (assumed) Prob > chi2 = 0.0000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

chmal | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------

safew | -.0102579 .0542928 -0.19 0.850 -.1166698 .096154

femsed | -.0207767 .0720456 -0.29 0.773 -.1619835 .1204301

des | .0279598 .0469644 0.60 0.552 -.0640887 .1200084

gdp | -.0102693 .0026252 -3.91 0.000 -.0154147 -.0051239

democ | -.744575 .6119889 -1.22 0.224 -1.944051 .4549012

var1 | -6.13e-06 9.40e-06 -0.65 0.514 -.0000246 .0000123

var2 | 9.01e-07 2.54e-07 3.55 0.000 4.03e-07 1.40e-06

res2 | -.1308313 .0816576 -1.60 0.109 -.2908774 .0292147

res1 | .0025414 .0041498 0.61 0.540 -.005592 .0106749

_cons | 12.01765 56.40751 0.21 0.831 -98.53904 122.5743

-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------

sigma_u | 9.3151279

sigma_e | 4.4393346

rho | .81491528 (fraction of variance due to u_i)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

test res2 res1

( 1) res2 = 0

( 2) res1 = 0

chi2( 2) = 3.16

Prob > chi2 = 0.2059

précédent sommaire






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Soit réservé sans ostentation pour éviter de t'attirer l'incompréhension haineuse des ignorants"   Pythagore