WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

A GIS-based modeling of environmental health risks in populated areas of Port-au-prince, Haiti

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Myrtho Joseph
University of Arizona - Master in Natural Resources Information System 1987
  

précédent sommaire suivant

2.8 Multi-Criteria Evaluation (MCE) and Weighted Linear Combination (WLC)

Multi-Criteria Evaluation consists of a set of procedures whose purpose is to facilitate decision making by investigating a number of alternatives in light of multiple conditions and conflicting objectives (Voogd 1983). It has been used in multiple fields, such as land suitability evaluation (Janssen and Rietveld 1990; Pereira and Duckstein 1993), urban planning (Voogd, 1983), and residential quality assessment (Can 1993). In MCE multiple layers can be scaled, weighted and summed into one stratum representing levels of suitability for an investigated issue (Eastman et al. 1995, Jankowski 1995). This process can be brought out by experts, interest groups and/or stakeholders founding their evaluation on the degree of suitability or the importance of the within variables of the issue considered (Dodgson et al. 2000, Malczewski 2004).

According to Eastman (2001), three techniques are generally used to implement MCE. The first option is Boolean Overlay in which the criteria are reduced to two logical suitability statements. This technique is deemed lacking of flexibility regarding the number of choices permitted (Mahini and Gholamalifard 2006). The second procedure, the Weighted Linear Combination (WLC), offers more flexibility than the Boolean approach. Hopkins (1977) portrayed WLC as the most common techniques to integrate multi-criteria evaluation in GIS for land suitability. The last technique is known as Ordered Weighted Average, which is a stronger extension of the two previous techniques, and which addresses uncertainty in modeling interaction between various criteria (Bell et al. 2007).

Another typology of MCE classifies it into two approaches: concordance-discordance analysis and WLC (Voogd 1983, Carver 1991, and Eastman et al. 1995). In the concordance-discordance approach each pair of cell is compared on specific criteria in order to determine which cell outweighs the other, while WLC is based on multiplying a designated weight to the multiple factors that are subsequently summed and ranked (Aly et al. 2005). Whereas the earlier is computational impractical for a large raster dataset, the later is suitable for solving problems which involves multiple factors with a raster geodatabase (Aly et al. 2005). The implementation of WLC is made simple within GIS, using map algebra operations and cartographic modeling (Tomlin 1990). In addition, it is easy to understand and appealing to decision makers (Massam 1988).

Weights assigned in a WLC process may derive from different techniques including Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) introduced by Saaty (1977) and based on pair-wise comparison of factors or alternatives; experts judgment or opinion used in many studies (e.g. Beaton 1986, Dakin and Armstrong 1989, Steptoe and Wardle 1994, Clevenger et al. 2002, Tobias 2004), and public opinion. AHP presents the inconvenient of being «too data-hungry», not intuitive, and inconsistency-prone (Bailey and Grossardt 2006). Wherever the pair wise comparison is to be achieved on an important quantity of variables, the process becomes cumbersome and can easily result in inconsistency related to the scores assigned. Surveying the public to collect its view about a matter to which it is unfamiliar would result in collecting erratic and meaningless data. The Expert Opinion Weighting (EOW) is considered more suited to this study for its flexibility and communication accessibility. Yet the designation of experts may be cautiously used since no similar study experience could be accounted to the respondents to the survey, though they all have working experience in health and environment.

précédent sommaire suivant











9Impact, le film from Onalukusu Luambo on Vimeo.


Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy