WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Characterisation of farming systems in southern Rwanda

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Alain Kalisa
Université nationale du Rwanda - ingenieur Agronome (bachelor degree) 2007
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

IV.2. SOIL NUTRIENT STATUS

The soil nutrient status are presented to show differences of N, P, K, OC content between farms from different wealth categories and between plots of the same farm and their average values.

IV.2.1 General Trend of Nutrient Distribution In Different Plots

In order to measure variability between farms and within farms, a soil analysis was performed on plots of different farmers. Two representative farms of each farm category and different plots belonging to the selected farms were sampled; this helped us to represent soil fertility status of different farm types identified during the survey. Results are presented as follow:

1) 2)

4) 3)

Figure 5: Variability of soil carbon (1), available P (2), exchangeable K (3) and total N (4) within plots of farm. Plots no increases as plot position moves from homestead to further away from home

From these figures, the general observation is that there is a difference of soil fertility from plot 1 up to plot 3. Form the graph (1) the general observation is that the level of carbon decreases as we move from plot 1 to plot 3. On basis of the norms of interpretation (Mutwewingabo et Rutunga, 1987) , the content of carbon in plot 1, 2 and 3 indicate that organic matter content in plot 1 is moderate (since we can determine the organic matter content of a soil by multiplying carbon values to 1.72 which is a constant), whereas in plot 2 and 3 is low. Based on the graph (2) it shows that the level of phosphorus in plot 1 is moderate and low in plot 2 and plot 3 respectively. The graph (3) reveals that the level of potassium in plot 1 is high, whereas content in plot 2 and plot 3 is moderate on basis of norms (Mutwewingabo et Rutunga, 1987). The graph (4) also show levels of nitrogen in plot 1 and plot 2 are moderate whereas the level in plot 3 is low. From these figures, evidence of decreasing soil fertility in different plots with the distance from the homestead is provided.

IV.2.2 Differences of Soil Fertility Within Farm

Mean values of two farms from each wealth category as presented by graphs below, reveals the soil nutrient content of plots on farm, the graphs are indicating the level of soil carbon, available phosphorus, potassium and nitrogen.

1) 2)

3) 4)

Figure 6: Variability of total N (1), exchangeable K (2), soil carbon (3), and Available P (4) in plots on farms in different wealth categories in Shanga

Plots of wealthy farmers as are indicated by graph 6 are the one containing more fertile, probably this in relation with large number of animals owned by the farmer. The high number of livestock providing enough organic manure to the farm may have a positive influence on soil fertility. Looking at the soil carbon graph (1) and referring to the standards of interpretation, we see that the plot 1 of well-off and middle farmers contains high level of organic carbon but that of the poor farmer has little content. However, a net C input was observed due to the transfer of biomass from other fields via crop residues or compost. The graph (2) indicates the level of phosphorus in 3 plots of different wealth group's farms. Based on the interpretation standards, it is evident that the plot 1 in all the wealth group contains moderate quantity of phosphorus, likewise in the plot 2 of the well-off and middle farmers, except that of the poor farmer which has low phosphorus level. The plot 3 of well-off farmer contains moderate phosphorus and low in the middle farmers. The P concentrations in close field reflected the inputs of ash, composted crop residues and manure, together with kitchen wastes and house sweepings normally containing chicken dug. Looking at the nitrogen level (graph (4)) and based on interpretation norms, plot 1 of the well-off and middle farmers contains high level of nitrogen but it is low in plot 1 of the poor farmers. Plots 2 and 3 of the well-off and middle farmer contain moderate nitrogen level, whereas the plot 2 of poor farmer contains low nitrogen quantity. Based on these data, a decreasing soil fertility level with the distance from the homestead is also shown.

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Là où il n'y a pas d'espoir, nous devons l'inventer"   Albert Camus