WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Degree of familiarity, inversion effect and quality of sleep through the type of images used in face recognition

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Cindy SCHUPBACH
Université Paul Valéry - Master 1 2016
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

II. METHOD:

1. Participants:

30 French participants were recruited on the campus of the Paul Valéry University in Montpellier to participate in the experiment. Wishing to carry out a search on a normal population, all persons with a psychiatric diagnosis were not excluded, a contrario visually impaired persons who had no correctors of any kind. The participants, whose data was kept between 18 and 31 years of age, had to be French right-handed and had to present themselves for the experiment accompanied by a friend who, also fulfilled these criteria, aware that they would not be rewarded. These men (4) and women (18) agreed to participate in the experiment as a result of free and informed consent.

2. Materials:

The forced pairing tasks, each consisting of 168 tests, designed on the E-prime software by Catherine Bortolon, were performed by participants using a 13.3-inch computer and split into two types: Natural tasks and standardized tasks. Two different tasks were provided for both task types. These experimental tasks consisted of images taken by the participant (4 images),

by his friend (4 images), by the experimenter (4 images for the participant and 4 images for the experimental partner articulating the sounds a, e and i) and images of unknowns (natural, standardized images). The images of the standardized unknowns were taken in boxes, at the University of Paul Valéry beforehand by the majority of the group. The test images of the training phase were mainly celebrities. All the images used were resized (260X350), appeared with an interval of 1000 milliseconds and were set black and white. Modified with the photoshop software, they represent the following stimulus styles: natural images (for the participant, for his experience partner, for the two unknowns), natural inverted images (for the participant, for his experienced partner, the standardized images (for the participant, for his partner of experience, for both unknowns) and the standardized inverted images (for the participant, for his partner of experience, for the two unknowns).

The sleep quality index of Pittsburgh (PSQI) (Buysse, Reynolds, Monk, Berman, Kupfer, 1989) is represented by an overall score (from 0 to 21) grouping 7 components receiving a score ranging from 0 to 3: the subjective quality of sleep; the latency of sleep; the duration of sleep; the usual efficacy of sleep; sleep disorders; the use of a sleep medication; bad shape during the day. It includes 19 self-assessment questions and 5 questions asked to the spouse or roommate if he has one. These 5 questions are not covered in this study. A score of 0 to one component indicates that there are no difficulties, while a score of up to 3 indicates severe difficulties. Compared to the overall score, a score of 0 indicates that there are no difficulties while a score

of up to 21 shows that there are major difficulties.

The manual laterality test (Oldfield, 1971) clarifies the participants' preferences about the use of their hands in certain activities. The proposed activities are 12 in number, each with the right-hand column and the left-hand column: writing, drawing, throwing a ball, holding scissors, using a toothbrush, using a knife, a spoon, A broom, rubbing a match, opening a pot (hand holding the lid), which foot is used when you are typing in a balloon, which eye you use when you need to use only one. Subjects must therefore indicate which hand they prefer to do certain activities: if they put a "+" in each column, it indicates that the activity is shared by both hands, if they put a "+" in one of the columns this indicates that this hand is used preferentially for this activity and if it puts two "+" in a column it indicates that the manual preference is exclusive for this activity. A manual lateral coefficient is then calculated: ((total D - total G) / (total D + total G)) X 100. A cut-off is provided: if the participant has a coefficient of -100 it will be categorized as left-handed Absolute, -50 will indicate that it is a preferential left-hander, 0 an

ambidextrous, +50 a preferential right-hander, +100 an absolute right-hander. 3. Procedure:

Initially, participants recruited according to certain criteria (right-handers, French nationality, aged 18 to 31) and motivated, had to come with a friend (right-handers, French nationality, between 18 and 31 years of age) had to provide a number of photographs before the day of the award. The standardized images for the participants were taken at Paul Valéry's library, in a box just before the start of the pass. For some participants, the natural photos were taken just before the start of the assignment as well and were therefore modified by the experimenter as the participants began to fill out the questionnaires. The counterbalancing of tasks and questionnaires was therefore not always respected: the participants had already completed the questionnaires before the experimenter had time to complete the modification of the photographs. All participants, who were already aware of the terms of the study, consulted the informative document and signed free and informed consent. For the participants who had sent me their photos the day before and had their complete file, a first counterbalancing took place: one participant performed both experimental tasks with both hands while his friend filled out the questionnaires in the Same box and in the presence of the experimenter so that he can answer the questions. The opposite was observed approximately 35 minutes afterwards. The participant had to press one of the two keys ("c" or "n") according to the pictures he saw on the screen. Depending on the name of the task (1 or 2), the keys were reversed to allow counterbalancing. For example, the "c" key could mean "similar face" while the "n" meant "different face". The images, which appeared for 1000 milliseconds, represented photographs of people (the participant, the friend or strangers) and were separated by a fixing cross. The participant was instructed to answer as correctly and as quickly as possible by pressing one of the two keys if he found that the face of a person presented (him, his friend or strangers) image corresponded to the face of the person seen on the first image.

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Enrichissons-nous de nos différences mutuelles "   Paul Valery