WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Quality of Service and performance characterization of IPv6 relative to IPv4

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par KAYUMBA Thierry and KAYUMBA Fred
National University of Rwanda - Bs Degree 2006
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

IV.5 TEST and ANALYSIS

The purpose of this step is to provide information about how to make a network; configure and test IPv6 protocol functionality and its features.

During the testing, we tested with minimum number of computers. Individual computers have been used to clearly show the QoS and the performance. The configuration, including IP addresses and all other configuration parameters. This network test lab has been tested on a separate network and services provided on the network to avoid the impact of the test on the network.

The following illustration shows the configuration of the Network test lab.

Figure 8: Network test-lab diagram

Source: Own drawing

We made this Network test lab by configuring two routers with both version of IP in order to forward and route packets across clients in this network. The configuration procedure is given in the Appendix.

We installed IPv6 on the side of clients and assigned statically the IPv4 addresses arranged in the appropriate network. The installation is shown in the next section IV.6.

IV.5.1 Ping Results of Network test lab

Our Network test lab ping results were to test the connectivity between work-stations that are in the network. Testing the connectivity between work-stations by using IPv4 addresses were different from using IPv6 addresses.

Testing the connectivity between work-stations that are assigned with IPv4 address can only be tested by using only one address but with IPv6 address the connectivity can be tested with many addresses for example pinging with IPv6 link local address, IPv6 site-local address, IPv6 addresses with embedded IPv4 addresses.

This is one of option that was upgrade to the IPv4, which is one of QoS the devices that support IPv6 can have multiple addresses.

Figure 9: Ping IPv4 address

Source: Output Print Screen of ping IPv4

Figure 10: Ping6 IPv6 site-local

Source: Output Print Screen of Ping6 site-local

Figure 11: Ping6 IPv6 link-local address

Source: Output Print Screen of Ping6 link-local

Figure 12: Ping6 IPv6 embedded IPv4 address

Source: Output Print Screen result of IPv6 embedded IPv4 address

As show in the figures below (figure 10, 11, 12); the TTL has been removed in ICMP packets which can allow ICMPv6 packets to pass quickly trough the network, and it can also allow ICMPV6 packets to test the connectivity without dying until it reach its destination.

IV.5.2 Netwrok test lab Telnet results

As we set a network that include both IP (a dual-stack); we tested with telnet by specifying the IPv4 or IPv6 address of the remote computer to connect to. From the telnet results, we were able to reach the nodes of router or computer connects to.

Figure 13: Telnet IPv6/IPv4

Source: Output of Print Screen of Telnet

IV.5.3 Network test lab Analysis

The Maa Tec Network analyzer has been used during testing the Network test lab

IV.5.3.1 IP packets test

Figure 14: The packets list.

Source: MaaTec Network analyzer/ Packet list

The figure above displays detailed information about the packets. In the packets list, there columns that display information about time and length of the collected packet, the network devices, Media Access Control (MAC) address of the sender or receiver of the packet, the OSI layer of source or destination source of the packet, type of service.

We selected among the packets captured in the layer column where IP laid. The layer 3 (network layer) of OSI model provided the information about the IP header of the system that sent or receive a packet and we compared both IP headers format.

IPv6 Packet

IPv4 Packets

IPv6 - Internet Protocol v6

Ver|DS|Flow: 60000000

Version: 6

Traffic Class: 0

Flow Label: 0

Payload Length: 40

Next Header: 58 (ICMP for IPv6)

Hop Limit: 64

Src FE80::211:43FF:FE2C:BF3C

Dest FE80::211:43FF:FE2C:6BDC

IPv4 - Internet Protocol v4

Ver/IHL: 45

Ver: 4 Header Length: 5 (20 bytes)

Type of Service: 00

Precedence: 0 (Routine)

normal delay | normal throughput | normal reliability

Total Length: 60

Identification: 341

Fragmentation: 0000

may fragment | last fragment

Fragment Offset: 0

Time to Live: 128

Protocol: 1 (Internet Control Message)

Checksum: 45819

Src 192.168.2.21

Dest 192.168.3.11

Table 4: IPv6 and IPv4 Header packet

Source: Maa Tec Network Analyzer

As shown in the table above the packets format is passing on the same port and the way IPv6 packets are forwarded by paths are different from those for IPv4.

This way IPv6 packets passes allow packets to pass quickly trough routers.

As there is change in design of IP, the new one carries a number of QoS. In IP header there is a good example of the features of QoS. The header of IPv6 is simplified; it does not have many fields to be checked.

This QoS can provide to a network to be fast when packets are traveling through the network.

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Piètre disciple, qui ne surpasse pas son maitre !"   Léonard de Vinci