WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Revisiting the Self-Help Housing debate: Perception of Self-Help Housing by the beneficiaries of South African low-cost housing

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Andre Mengi Yengo
Witwatersrand of Johannesburg RSA - Master 2006
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

3.2.4. The Market SHH

This form of SHH is the objective of neo-liberal policy. Indeed, with the focus on the market, neo-liberals argue that an individual may find everything that he/she needs. He/She can purchase land, the materials of construction and the all necessary materials in the market. This kind of SHH may be qualified as the most successful SHH as it is the expression of Turner's dream (the full appropriation of housing process by an individual) without acting illegally. It may be recommended where the economic situation provides opportunities to everyone to determine his/her ends and to find ways to attain it. In comparison to the third form of SHH described above, this fourth form of SHH called sometimes «market driven» (see South African Housing White paper) explains the situation of economic stability while the second and the third form of SHH is the manifestation of economic crisis. In this sense, as the main objective of neo-liberalist policies is to help developing countries to stabilize their macro-economy through economy growth (Colclough, 1991a), the market SHH is the expression of liberalism and neo-liberalism.

However, it may be said that this kind of SHH is appropriate for rich people and is welcomed in capitalist societies. Besides, it reinforces the gap existing between poor people and rich people. If the State cannot support those who are unable to adequately solve their housing need, the fourth form of SHH may force low-income families to develop squatter settlements or to find their own way of solving their housing need. As a result, the poorest of the poor will not have another alternative than to resort to illegality and informality.

Consequently, this SHH will only favour a specific group, more specifically in poor countries and penalize others, especially those with great differences in household income, for example in a country with a high GINI co-efficient. It may be said that this kind of SHH is not appropriate as policy for developing countries. Indeed, it requires economic stability, high level of education and the ability of people to perform in the market. Nevertheless, developing countries including South Africa, which may be considered as one of the most advanced developing countries, do not yet attain this level. In sum, the fourth form of SHH is not appropriate for developing countries which still struggle for economic growth and macro economic stability.

In the description of the different forms of SHH, it is acknowledged that each form presents strengths and weaknesses as well. The section below will emphasize strengths and weaknesses of SHH.

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Un démenti, si pauvre qu'il soit, rassure les sots et déroute les incrédules"   Talleyrand