WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Revisiting the Self-Help Housing debate: Perception of Self-Help Housing by the beneficiaries of South African low-cost housing

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Andre Mengi Yengo
Witwatersrand of Johannesburg RSA - Master 2006
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

3.4.2 The Canadian experience of Self-Help Housing

The Canadian experience of aided SHH is documented in Schulist and Harris (2002). They analyse aided SHH in the period 1940 to 1975. These authors emphasize the government assistance in the success of aided SHH in Canada. Indeed, they advocate that with finance and technical assistance, every citizen may be able to build his own shelter.

These authors show that the success of Canadian experience of aided SHH has been made possible from the real services that the Government has provided. They point out that, «Amateurs built well because they received good guidance: well informed, firm on essentials, but otherwise flexible» (Shulist et al, 2002: 359).

The criteria which have contributed to the success of this programme are: provision of land which was not over complicated, finance mechanism which was also accessible to poor households (in the Canadian case, the poor household heads were veterans), the technical assistance that beneficiaries or self builders have received from the government and also the quality of administration.

Regarding the government assistance, the authors affirm that «the Administration offered five types of assistance: free legal service, house plans, construction courses, supervision and financing» (Shulist et al, 2002: 352). It may be observed that the authors stress the role of government more than the participation of the beneficiaries.

Despite some weaknesses of the Canadian SHH programme such as the promotion of scattered development, these authors argue that «over three decades, it helped thousands of families to acquire well-built homes by investing sweat equity. It saved families a great deal while costing the public much less» (Shulist et al, 2002: 366). In sum, the Canadian experience of SHH shows that the role of government in the success of SHH needs to be taken seriously.

Before addressing the criteria for successful SHH, I would like to analyze the emergence and the experience of SHH in South Africa as presented in the literature.

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"La première panacée d'une nation mal gouvernée est l'inflation monétaire, la seconde, c'est la guerre. Tous deux apportent une prospérité temporaire, tous deux apportent une ruine permanente. Mais tous deux sont le refuge des opportunistes politiques et économiques"   Hemingway