WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Impact of the cost of the care of health of menages in Kinshasa

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Jérémy MESKIA MAVANGA
Université de Kinshasa RDC - Licence 2010
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

3.3.3.Monthly expenditure of the care of health for paludism

Table 21, shows us that 38,3% of the surveyed households did not suffer from paludism against 61,7% which suffered from it.

3.3.3.1.Expenditure for the consultation (Dcon)

It is deduced from this table 22, 67,5% of the households spend a sum ranging between 2500 and 4500FC for the consultation, 32,4% spent between 4500 and 9000FC.The average of this expenditure is 4554,04FC is 5,0$USD by household.

3.3.3.2. Expenditure for the laboratory

 

This table 24, indicates that 21,6% of the households spend a sum ranging between 1 000 and 1 000FC for the test of laboratory, 27,0% to us spent between 1 000 and 1 500FC, 24,3% spent between 1 500 and 2 000FC and 29,7% spent beyond 2 000FC.The average of this expenditure is 1594,59FC is 1,7$USD by household.

3.3.3.3.Expenditure of hospitalization

 

It is deduced from this table that 50,0% of the households spend a sum between 5 000 and 10 000FC in the event of hospitalization, 12,5% spent between 10 000 and 15 000FC, 37,5% spent between 3 000 and 4500 with an average of 11 875FC is 13,0$USD by household.

3.3.3.4.Expenditure of nonhospitalization

 

It is deduced from this table 25, 8,1% of the households spend a sum ranging between 1000 and 1500FC in the event of nonthe hospitalization, 27,0% spent between 500 and 1 000FC, 10,8% spent between 1500 and 2 000FC and 32,4% spent more than 2 000FC.The average of this expenditure is 1560,3FC is 1,7$USD by household.

3.3.3.5.Expenditure for control

This table 26, shows us that 78,3% of the households spend less than 10 000 for control, 21,6% spent beyond 10 000FC, with an average of 7162,16FC is 7,8$USD by household.These spend include the consultation and the tests of laboratory.

3.3.3.6.Expenditure of the drugs

 

It is deduced from this table 27, that 73,0% of the households spend a sum between 300 - 1500FC for purchase of the drugs of paludism, 10,8% spent between 1500 and 3000FC, 16,2% spent between 3000 and 4500 with an average of 1508,1FC is 1,6$USD by household.

3.3.3.7.Other expenditure

 

This table 28, shows us that 41,8% of the households spend between 1000 and 3000 for other expenditure, 21,8% spent between 6 000 and 9 000FC, 14,5% spent between 9 000 and 12 000 and 20,0% spent beyond 12 000FC.The average of this expenditure is 5472,9FC is equivalent to 6,0$USD by household.This expenditure includes the expenditure keeps sick, transport.

3.3.3.8.Total expenditure of the care of health for paludism

 

The total expenditure of the households for the care of health is
the sum of all the averages in particular:of consultation laboratory

, control

(the hospitalization , not hospitalization

.

, and the Other monthly expenditure

That is to say:

The total monthly expenditure of the households rises 28 674,27FC is 31,5$USD i.e., a household spends close to 31,5$USD to look after a member of family which suffers from paludism.

3.3.4.Other aspects related to paludism 3.3.4.1. Place of the care

It rises from this table 29 that 44,8% of the households were looked after in centers of health against 55,2% which takes the direction of the hospital.

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Il y a des temps ou l'on doit dispenser son mépris qu'avec économie à cause du grand nombre de nécessiteux"   Chateaubriand