WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

La mécanique statistique des membranes biologiques confinées

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Khalid EL HASNAOUI
Faculté des sciences Ben M'Sik Casablanca - Thèse de doctorat  2011
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

II. THEORETICAL FORMULATION

Consider a fluctuating fluid membrane that is confined to two interacting parallel walls 1 and 2. We denote by D their finite separation. Naturally, the separation D must be compared to the bulk membrane roughness, L01, when the system is unconfined (free membrane). The membrane is confined only when the condition L << L01 is fulfilled. For the opposite condition, that is L >> L01, we expect finite size corrections.

We assume that these walls are located at z = -D/2 and z = D/2, respectively. Here, z means the perpendicular distance. For simplicity, we suppose that the two surfaces are physically equivalent. We design by V (z) the interaction potential exerted by one wall on the fluid membrane, in the absence of the other. Usually, V (z) is the sum of a repulsive and an attractive potentials. A typical example is provided by the following potential [22]

V (z) = Vh (z) + VvdW (z) , (2.0)

where

Vh (z) = Ahe-z/Ah (2.0)
represents the repulsive hydration potential due to the water molecules inserted between hydrophilic lipid heads [22]. The amplitude Ah and the potential-range ëh are of the order of : Ah ^, 0.2 J/m2 and ëh ^, 0.2-0.3 nm. In fact, the amplitude Ah is Ah = Ph xëh, with the hydration pressure Ph ^, 108-109 Pa. There, VvdW (z) accounts for the van der Waals potential between one wall and biomembrane, which are a distance z apart. Its form is as follows

[ ]

H 1 1

VvdW (z) = - ,

z2 - 2

(z + ä)2 + (2.0)

12ð (z + 2ä)2

with the Hamaker constant H ^, 10-22 - 10-21 J, and ä ^, 4 nm denotes the membrane thickness. For large distance z, this implies

2

VvdW (z) ? z4 . (2.0)
Generally, in addition to the distance z, the interaction potential V (z) depends on certain length-scales, (î1, ...,în), which are the interactions ranges. The fluid membrane then experiences the following total potential

I D ) I D ) , -D

U (z) = V 2 - z + V 2 + z 2 < z < D 2 . (2.0)
In the Monge representation, a point on the membrane can be described by the three-dimensional position vector r = (x, y, z = h (x, y)), where h (x, y) E [-D/2, D/2] is the height-field. The latter then fluctuates around the mid-plane located at z = 0.

The Statistical Mechanics for the description of such a (tensionless) fluid membrane is based on the standard Canham-Helfrich Hamiltonian [9, 23]

? ]

1-l [h] = dxdy 2 (?h)2 + W (h) , (2.0)
with the membrane bending rigidity constant ê. The latter is comparable to the thermal energy kBT, where T is the absolute temperature and kB is the Boltzmann's constant. There, W (h) is the interaction potential per unit area, that is

U (h)

W (h) = L2 , (2.0)
where the potential U (h) is defined in Eq. (2), and L is the lateral linear size of the biomembrane. Let us discuss the pair-potential W (h).

K. El Hasnaoui et al. African Journal Of Mathematical Physics Volume 8(2010)101-114

Firstly, Eq. (2) suggests that this total potential is an even function of the perpendicular distance h, that is

W (-h) = W (h) . (2.0)

In particular, we have W (-D/2) = W (D/2).

Secondly, when they exist, the zeros h0's of the potential function U (h) are such that

(D ) (D )

V 2 - h0 = -V 2 + h0 . (2.0)

This equality indicates that, if h0 is a zero of the potential function, then, -h0 is a zero too. The number of zeros is then an even number. In addition, the zero h0's are different from 0, in all cases. Indeed, the quantity V (D/2) does not vanish, since it represents the potential created by one wall at the middle of the film. We emphasize that, when the potential processes no zero, it is either repulsive or attractive. When this same potential vanishes at some points, then, it is either repulsive of attractive between two consecutive zeros.

Thirdly, we first note that, from relation (2), we deduce that the first derivative of the potential function, with respect to distance h, is an odd function, that is W' (-h) = -W' (h). Applying this relation to the midpoint h = 0 yields : W' (0) = 0. Therefore, the potential W exhibits an extremum at h = 0, whatever the form of the function V (h). We find that this extremum is a maximum, if V ?(D/2) < 0, and a minimum, if V ?(D/2) > 0. The potential U presents an horizontal tangent at h = 0, if only if V ?(D/2) = 0. On the other hand, the general condition giving the extrema {hm} is

dV dh

????h= D 2 -hm

dV =

dh

????h= D 2 +hm

. (2.0)

Since the first derivative W' (h) is an odd function of distance h, it must have an odd number of extremum points. The point h = hm is a maximum, if

and a minimum, if

d2V dh2

????h= D 2 -hm

<

d2V dh2

????h= D 2 +hm

,

(2.0)

d2V dh2

????h= D 2 -hm

>

d2V dh2

????h= D 2 +hm

. (2.0)

At point h = hm, we have an horizontal tangent, if

d2V

dh2

????h= D 2 +hm

. (2.0)

d2V dh2

????h= D 2 -hm

104

The above deductions depends, of course, on the form of the interaction potential V (h).

Fourthly, a simple dimensional analysis shows that the total interaction potential can be rewritten on the following scaling form

W (h) kBT

D2Ö( = 1 h1n 1 (2.0)
D, D,..., D J ,

where (î1, ...,în) are the ranges of various interactions experienced by the membrane, and Ö(x1, ..., xn+1) is a (n + 1)-factor scaling-function.

Finally, we note that the pair-potential W (h) cannot be singular at h = 0. It is rather an analytic function in the h variable. Therefore, at fixed ratios îi/D, an expansion of the scaling-function Ö, around the value h = 0, yields

W (h) kBT

h2

2 D4

= ã + (h4) . (2.0)

K. El Hasnaoui et al. African Journal Of Mathematical Physics Volume 8(2010)101-114

105

We restrict ourselves to the class of potentials that exhibit a minimum at the mid-plane h = 0. This assumption implies that the coefficient ã is positive definite, i.e. ã > 0. Of course, such a coefficient depends on the ratios of the scale-lengths îi to the separation D.

In confinement regime where the distance h is small enough, we can approximate the total interaction potential by its quadratic part. In these conditions, the Canham-Helfrich Hamiltonian becomes

W0 [h] = 2 J dxdy [1ê (?h)2 + uhl , (2.0)

with the elastic constant

u = ã kBT

D4 .(2.0)

The prefactor ã will be computed below. The above expression for the elastic constant u gives an idea on its dependance on the film thickness D. In addition, we state that this coefficient may be regarded as a Lagrange multiplier that fixes the value of the membrane roughness.

Thanks to the above Hamiltonian, we calculate the mean-expectation value of the physical quantities, like the height-correlation function (propagator or Green function), defined by

G (x - x', y - y') = (h (x, y) h (x',y')) - (h (x, y)) (h (x',y')) . (2.0)

The latter solves the linear differential equation

c?2 + u)G(x - x',y - y') = ä (x - x')ä (y - y') , (2.0)

where ä (x) denotes the one-dimensional Dirac function, and ? = ?2/?x2 + ?2/?y2 represents the two-dimensional Laplacian operator. We have used the notations : = ê/kBT and u = u/kBT, to mean the reduced membrane elastic constants.

From the propagator, we deduce the expression of the membrane roughness

L2? = (h2) - (h)2 = G(0,0) . (2.0)

Such a quantity measures the fluctuations of the height-function (fluctuations amplitude) around the equilibrium plane located at z = 0. We show in Appendix that the membrane roughness is exactly given by

2

L2 = 12, (2.0)

provided that one is in the confinement-regime, i.e. D << L0?. Notice that the above equality indicates that the roughness is independent on the geometrical properties of the membrane (through ê). We emphasize that this relation can be recovered using the argument that each point of the membrane has equal probability to be found anywhere between the walls [24].

The elastic constant u may be calculated using the known relation

L2 1 kBT = (2.0)

?8 ,urs .

This gives

u =

9 (kBT)2

êD4 . (2.0)

4

This formula clearly shows that this elastic constant decays with separation D as D-4. The term uh2/2 then describes a confinement potential that ensures the localization of the membrane around the mid-plane. Integral over the hole plane R2 of this term represents the loss entropy due to the confinement of the membrane. The value (19) of the elastic constant is compatible with the constraint (17).

Therefore, the elaborated model is based on the Hamiltonian (13), with a quadratic confinement potential. We can say that the presence of the walls simply leads to a confinement of the membrane in a region

K. El Hasnaoui et al. African Journal Of Mathematical Physics Volume 8(2010)101-114

of the infinite space of perpendicular size L?.

We define now another length-scale that is the in-plane correlation length, L?. The latter measures the correlations extent along the parallel directions to the walls. More precisely, the propagator G (x - x', y - y') fails exponentially beyond L?, that is for distances d such that d =

v(x - x')2 + (y - y')2 > L?. From the standard relation

L2 ? = kBT

16ê L2 ? , (2.0)

we deduce

L

(2.0)

( ê )1/2

2

? = v3 D .

kBT

In contrary to L?, the length-scale L? depends on the geometrical characteristics of the membrane (through ê).

The next steps consist in the computation of the Casimir force at and out equilibrium.

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"L'imagination est plus importante que le savoir"   Albert Einstein