WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Impact of eco-innovation on firms competitiveness. An empirical study based on Mannheim Innovation Panel

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Abdelfettah BITAT
College of Europe - Master of Art 2012
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

Bibliography

Akerlof, G., 1970. The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Issue 84, pp. 488-500.

Ambec, S. & Barla, P., 2006. Can Environmental Regulations be Good for Business? An Assessment of the PorterHypothesis. Energy Studies Review, 14(2).

Ambec, S. & Barla, P., 2007. Quand la réglementation environnementale profite aux pollueurs Survol des fondements théoriques de l'hypothèse de Porter, Laval: GREEN working paper, Laval University.

Ambec, S., Cohen, M., Elgie, S. & Lanoie, P., 2010. The porter hypothesis at 20:Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness?, Montreal, Canada: CIRANO Working Papers.

Ambec, S. & Lanoie, P., 2007. When and Why Does It Pay To Be Green?. CIRANO Working Papers 2007s-20, CIRANO.

Ambec, S. & Lanoie, P., 2009. Performance environnementale et économique de l'entreprise. Economie & Prévision, Issue 190, pp. 71-94.

Ashford, N. A., 2002. Technology-focused regulatory approaches for encouraging sustainable industrial transformations: beyond green, beyond the dinosaurs and beyond evolutionary theory, Brussels: Paper in the framework of the Blueprint Workshop on Instruments for Integrating Environmental and Innovation Policy.

Blind, K., 2011. The Influence of Regulations on Innovation: A Quantitative Assessment for OECD Countries. Policy Research, 41(12), pp. 391-400.

Boyd, D. A. & McClelland, J. D., 1999. The impact of environmental constraints on productivity improvement in integrated paper plants. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Issue 38, pp. 121-142.

Brännlund, R. & Lundgren, T., 2009. Environmental policy without costs? A review of the Porter hypothesis. The International Review of Environmental and Resource , 3(2), pp. 75- 117.

Cearnitzki, D. & Kraft, K., 2008. On the Profitability of Innovative Assets, Mannheim: ZEW Discussion Paper No. 04-38.

Cerin, P., 2006. Bringing economic opportunity into line with environmental influence: A discussion on the Coase theorem and the Porter and van der Linde hypothesis. Ecological Economics, Issue 56 , pp. 209-225 .

Clayton, A., Spinardia, G. & Williams, R., 1999. Policies for Cleaner Technology: a New Agenda for Government and Industry. London: Earthscan.

Coase, R., 1960. The problem of social cost. The Journal of Law and Economics, Issue 3, pp. 1-44.

Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A., 1989. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal, Issue 99, pp. 569-596.

CZARNITZKI, D. & LICHT, G., 2006. Additionality of Public R&D Grants in a Transition Economy: The Case of Eastern Germany. Economics of Transition, 14(1), pp. 101-131. Dosi, G., 1988. Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(3), pp. 1120-1171.

Drucker, P. F., 1985. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Practices and Principles. New York: Harper & Row.

Dufour, C., Lanoie, P. & Patry, M., 1998. Regulation and Productivity. Journal of Productivity Analysis, pp. 233-247.

Esty, D. & Porter, M. E., 1998. Industrial ecology and competitiveness: strategic implications for the firm. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1), pp. 35-43.

Gabel, H. L. & Sinclair-Desgagné, B., 1993. Managerial incentives and environmental compliance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Issue 24, p. 229-240.

Gabel, H. L. & Sinclair-Desgagné, B., 2001. The firm, its procedures and win-win environmental regulations. In: H. Folmer, L. H. Gabel, S. Gerking & A. Rose, eds. Frontiers of Environmental Economics. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.

Gray, W., 1987. The Cost of Regulation : OSHA, EPA and the Productivity Slowdown. American Economic Review, pp. 998-1006.

Gray, W. B. & Shadbegian, R. J., 1995. Pollution Abatement Costs, Regulation and Plant Level Productivity, Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 4994.

Greene, W. H., 2009. Econometric Analysis. 7th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

Jaffe, A. B. & Palmer, K., 1997. Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), pp. 610-619.

Jaffe, A. B., Peterson, S. R., Portney, P. R. & Stavins, R. N., 1995. Environmental Regulationand the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing : What Does the Evidence Tell Us. Journal of Economic Literature, pp. 132-163.

Katz, G., 2003. The Costs and Financial Benefits of Green Buildings, California: Sustainable Building Task Force.

Kemp, R., 1993. An economic analysis of cleaner technology: theory and evidence. In: K. Fischer & J. Schot, eds. Environmental Strategies for Industry,International Research Perspectives on Research Needs and Policy Implications. Washington DC: Island, pp. 79- 113.

Kemp, R. & Pearson, P., 2008. Project about measuring eco-innovation, Maastricht: Final report MEI .

King, A. & Lenox, M., 2001. Does it Really Pay to be Green? An Empirical Study of Firm Environmental and Financial Performance. The Journal of Industrial Ecology, pp. 105-117. Klemmer, P., 1999. Innovation and Environment. Berlin: Analytica-Verlag.

Krozer, J., 2002. Environment and Innovations, PhD Thesis. Groningen, The Netherlands: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.

Lanoie, P. & Laplante, B., 1992. Des billets verts pour des entreprises vertes. Gestion, pp. 41-47.

Lanoie, P., Ambec, S. & Scott, I., 2007. Des billets verts pour des entreprises vertes?, Montreal, Canada: CIRANO.

Lanoie, P., Lucchetti, J., Johnstone, N. & Ambec, S., 2011. Environmental Policy,innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy.

Lanoie, P. & TANGUAY, G. A., 1999. Dix exemples de rentabilité financière liés à une saine gestion environnementale. Revue Gestion, pp. 30-38.

Lundgren, T. & Marklund, P. O., 2010. Climate Policy and Profit Efficiency, Umeå: Working paper No. 11, Centre for Environmental and Resource Economics.

Murty, M. N. & Kumar, S., 2001. Win-Win Opportunities and Environmental Regulation: Testing of Porter Hypothesis for Indian Manufacturing Industries, Mimeo, India: Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi University Enclave.

Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G., 1977. In search of useful theory of innovation. Research Policy, Issue 6, p. 36-76.

OECD/EUROSTAT, 2005. Oslo Manual - Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, Paris: s.n.

Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, 1993. Environmental Policies and Industrial Competitiveness, Paris: OECD.

Palmer, K., Oates, W. E. & Portney, P. R., 1995. Tightening Environmental Standards : The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm ?. Journal of Economic Perspective, pp. 119-132. Pavitt, K., 1984. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, Volume 13, p. 343-373.

Peters, B., 2008. Innovation and firm performance: An empirical investigation for German evidence, Mannheim: ZEW Discussion Paper 04-73, ZEW.

Porter, M. E., 1991. America's Green Strategy 264, no. 4 (April 1991). Scientific American, 264(4), p. 168.

Porter, M. E. & van der Linde, C., 1995. Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), pp. 97-118. Rammer, C. & Rexhauser, S., 2011. Unmasking the Porter Hypothesis: Environmental Innovations and Firm-Profitability, Mannheim: ZEW - Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 11-036..

Rehfeld, K., Rennings, K. & Ziegler, A., 2004. Integrated Product Policy and Environmental Product Innovations: an Empirical Analysis, Mannheim: ZEW Discussion Paper 04-71.

Rennings, K., 2000. Redefining innovation - eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, Issue 32, p. 319-332.

Repetto, R., 1995. Jobs, Competitiveness and Environmental Regulation: What Are the Real Issues?, Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.

Ryan, C., 2003. Learning from a decade (or so) of eco-design experience, part I. Journal of Industrial Ecology, Issue 7, pp. 10-12.

Schumpeter, J. A., 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper. Sharma, S. & Aragon-Correa, A., 2005. A Corporate Environmental Strategy and Competitive Advantage. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Simpson, D. & Bradford III, R., 1996. Taxing variable cost: environmental regulation as industrial policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Issue 30, pp. 282- 300.

Sinclair Desgagné, B., 2004. corporate strategies to managing environmental risk. Série scientifique CIRANO.

Sinclair-Desgagné, B., 1999. Remarks on Environmental Regulation, Firm Behavior and Innovation, Montreal, Canada: Working Paper 99s-20. Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en analyse des organisations (CIRANO).

Stewart, R. B., 1993. Environmental regulation and international competitiveness.. The Yale Law Journal, Issue 102, pp. 2039-2106.

The Mannheim Innovation Panel: Manufacturing and Mining & Services, 2008. Guide to the survey's datasets for external users, 1993 to 2008 surveys. Mannheim: ZEW.

Triebswetter, U. & Wackerbauer, J., 2008. Integrated Environmental Product Innovation and Impacts on Company Competitiveness: a Case Study of the Automotive Industry in the Region of Munich. European Environment, Issue 18, pp. 30-44.

Türpitz, K., 2004. The Determinants and Effects of Environmental Product Innovations - An Analysis on the Basis of Case Studies, Mannheim: ZEW Discussion Paper 04-02.

Vuong, V. A., 2011. R&D, Innovations and Productivity, Ph.D Thesis, Pennsylvania : The Pennsylvania State University.

Wagner, M., 2004. The Porter Hypothesis Revisited: A Literature Review of Theoretical Models and Empirical Tests, Lueneburg: Centre for Sustainability Management, Chair of Corporate Environmental Management, University of Lueneburg.

Xepapadeas, A. & de Zeeuw, A., 1999. Environmental policy and competitiveness: The Porter hypothesis and the composition of capital. Journal of Environment Economics and Management, Issue 37, pp. 165-182.

ZEW, 2009. Mannheim Innovation Panel (MIP). Mannheim, Germany: ZEW.

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Il existe une chose plus puissante que toutes les armées du monde, c'est une idée dont l'heure est venue"   Victor Hugo