WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Infinite dilution activity coefficient measurements of organic solutes in fluorinated ionic liquids by gas-liquid chromatography and the inert gas stripping method

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Kaniki TUMBA
University of Kwazalu-Natal - Master 2009
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

CHAPTER THREE: THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Chapter overview

The theory and equations used to compute infinite dilution activity coefficients by two selected methods are presented. Where necessary, enough details on derivation procedures are provided. Assumptions leading to the derivation of these mathematical relationships are highlighted. They determine the reliability of the experimentally generated data. The modeling of mass transfer in the dilutor cell, as presented in the literature, is reviewed. It represents an important basis on which the dilutor cell constructed for this work was designed.

3.1. Gas liquid chromatography

Gas liquid chromatography is a well established method for determining infinite dilution activity coefficient of volatile solutes in nonvolatile solvents (Letcher 1980). It is logically used

C L

in this study of ionic liquids which are generally known as high boiling solvents. Equations

K C M

involved in IDAC`s computations, discussed by Letcher (1980) as well as Condor and Young (1979) and used in this work are given below. As the solute (1) moves through the column, it is assumed that:

· The mobile or gas phase is an ideal mixture composed of the carrier gas (2) and the solute (1);

· The stationary gas is a real liquid mixture, containing the solute and the solvent (3);

· The gas phase (mobile phase denoted as M) and the liquid phase (stationary phase, denoted as L, i.e. ionic liquid) are in thermodynamic equilibrium, well described by the modified Raoult`s law.

The distribution coefficient, of the solute between the two phases, according to Condor and

n

Young (1979), is:

(3-1)

Concentration of the solute in the liquid and gas phases are given by

(3-2)

and, (3-3)

where and are the mole fractions of the solute in the liquid and gas phases respectively,

is the number of moles of the carrier gas in the mobile phase, is the number of moles of the

solvent in the stationary phase, is the volume of the gas phase and

stationary phase. From equations (3-1) through (3-3), it can be found that:

is the volume of the

 

(3-4)

 
 

(3-5)

and using modified Raoult`s law, i.e.

 

(3-6)

Equation (3-4) can be written in a simplified form as:

 
 

(3-7)

 
 

At mean column pressure (Laub and Peacsok 1978), the net retention volume, , is related to the distribution coefficient and the volume of the stationary phase by:

(3-8)

When this expression is used in equation (3-7), the following equation determined by Porter et al. (1956) is obtained:

(3-9)

When the solute-solute and solute-carrier gas imperfections, as well as the pressure drop along the column are considered, a more accurate equation (Everett 1965, Cruickshank et al. 1966a and 1969) is derived:

(3-10)

where is the infinite dilution activity coefficient of a solute (1) in a solvent (3), T is the

column temperature, is the column outlet pressure, the same as the atmospheric pressure,

is the column inlet pressure, is the mean column pressure, , the saturated pressure

vapour of the solute at temperature T, is the molar volume of the solute, is the partial

molar volume at infinite dilution, equal to, in this particular case. is the pressure

correction term given by

(3-11)

is the net retention volume given by

(3-12)

, the column outlet flow-rate, the retention time for the solute and is the inert gas retention time.

The second virial coefficients of pure solutes were calculated using the McGlashan and

Potter equation (1962).

(3-13)

The same equation allowed the calculation of mixed virial coefficients

? ? ? ? ? ? . Other mixed

properties are determined by means of Hudson and McCourbey`s (1960) mixing rules as follows:

(3-14)

(3-15)

(3-16)

(3-17) In the last four expressions, subscripts =1`, =2` and =12` refer to the solute, the carrier gas and the mixture of these two components, n is the number of carbon atoms and is equated to one for

x f I y P

1 ? 1 = ?

1 1

compounds with no carbon atom. Critical properties and as well as the ionization

energies, are found in the literature (CRC Handbook 2005). Modified Rackett equation (Poling et al. 2001) gives the values of molar volumes as follows:

(3-18) Saturated vapour pressures involved in equation (3-10) were calculated using the Antoine, modified Antoine or Wagner equations in compliance with the applicability range of each

x f oq I y P

3 ? 3 3 = ?

3 3 3

correlation. Constants for vapour pressure correlations which are required in equation (3-10) as well as acentric factors were taken from the literature (Poling et al. 2001).

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Enrichissons-nous de nos différences mutuelles "   Paul Valery