WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Primary education and entrepreneurship in east Africa: a case study of private schools for the poor in Kibera(Kenya)

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Keunne Nodem Eric
University of Newcastle Upon-Tyne - Master of Education 2010
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

Chapter Three - Methodology

3.1 The research methods of the study

3.1.1 Theoretical framework

The methodology chapter reports on the various ways the research has been carried out and presented. In order to allow an in-depth analysis of the research questions, a case study was found most appropriate. The advantage of this specific approach remains the fact that it offers the researcher the opportunity to probe deeply and analyse interactions between the factors that explain present status or that influence change or growth and it therefore provides a ground for one aspect of a problem to be studied in some depth (Best, J &Kahn 2003:249, Bell 2005:10).

The case study is defined as a research strategy which focuses on the understanding the dynamics present within single settings and can employ embedded design or better still multiple level of analysis within a single study (Eisenhardt, 1989; Yin, 1984).

A number of 20 private school owners (entrepreneurs), 25 teachers and 25 pupils of 5 selected schools were thus chosen to focus the study on. Researching primary education and entrepreneurship in East Africa henceforth required specific method that would provide a better understanding of the complexities surrounding entrepreneurship. From these perspectives, it then sounded very obvious and relevant to find in the case study approach the most adequate way of conducting our research considering the socio-economic environment in which it was done.

However, this structural approach has always met severe critics from scholars «misunderstandings» of its operational ability to offer concrete results (Tellis 1997, Yin. Some of the most common points for these misunderstandings are generally related to the fact that, with this approach:

Ø The theoretical knowledge is more valuable than practical knowledge.

Ø One cannot generalise from a single case, therefore, the single-case study cannot contribute to scientific development.

Ø The case study is most useful for generating hypotheses, whereas other methods are more suitable for hypothesis testing and theory building.

Ø The case study contains a bias toward verification, and

Ø It is often difficult to summarise specific case studies (Flyvbjerg, 2006:219)

Nonetheless, in a response to a major point of these concerns, namely that of the generalization in case studies, (Denscombe 1998, cited in Bell, 2005:11) rightly points out that:

«The extent to which findings from case study can be generalized to other examples in the class depends on how far the case study example is similar to others of its type».

Closely related to this last aspect, our conviction still remained that, the field of education, being very broad and extended in the overall social sciences, needed some case studies in order to critically analyse certain phenomenon. The motivation gearing to the massive presence of private school entrepreneurs and the mushrooming of private schools catering for the poor in a slum such as Kibera could only be well understood through a case study approach.

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Ceux qui vivent sont ceux qui luttent"   Victor Hugo