II. RELATED ECONOMETRIC ESTIMATE OF
THE MODEL
The econometric model is twice computed. Once it is regressed
as further above mentioned in the methodology to generate the determinants of
WTP and second is computed a self-dependent variable to generate the amount of
WTP. Determinants of WTP are first given by the below table.
II.2. Determinants of WTP towards
Ngweshe local leadership
Table four: determinants of WTP
|
Variable Model1.
Model 2 Model 3
|
|
_cons -344.4466
-408.9637 -1065.497**
(445.3187)
(443.4349) (474.7537)
Age 5.778969
3.475518 -.9431211
(5.804049)
(5.831309) (7.199842)
Household size 6.901429
8.008575 5.315404
(14.55212)
(14.37865) (14.95299)
Sex 47.89076
43.65722 -47.09211
(93.41336)
(92.87509) (91.01455)
Marital status 15.96233
27.43283 27.21543
(57.93045)
(58.68485) (56.47982)
Educational level
Primary 393.4607
521.014*** 508.8818 ***
(258.7015)
(269.8894) (261.6663)
Secondary 368.3236***
404.5382*** 371.4343 ***
(222.6376)
(221.6682) (225.2885)
Academic 468.3764**
502.0473** 499.3925 **
(225.8814)
(223.7823) (216.8748)
Religion -36.23913
-9.671601 -68.94029
(82.88123)
(82.93868) (78.7152)
Friends in the organization
22.66025 106.1979
(98.08002) (102.4303)
Num_persons of notoriety
25.86194** 24.23693 **
(12.28004) (11.74927)
Duration in town
5.7078
(5.973686)
Membership of an organi.
100.6749
(154.5649)
Notable monthly income.
0770756 **
(9.0321531)
Trust in local leaders
-110.7046 ***
(67.00494)
Number of organization
40.35309
(37.71582)
Index of asset
190.7712 **
(91.48116)
Set price amount
.1299662
(.3877647)
Important sch. in grouping
31.93639
(78.61212)
|
|
Wald chi2 6.62
(0.5782) 11.16 (0.3452) 43.20
(0.0008)
|
|
**And *** respectively Significant at 5and
10%.
|
Source: own primary data process in Stata 14.0.
II.2.1. Interpretation of findings
As for predictor variables, the model bares that they
approximately all come closer to positively affect notables' WTP except
variable «trust in local leaders». After introducing controlling
variables in using a stepwise process, five variables are found significant.
They are Educational level, the Number of persons of notoriety in the notables'
organization, notable monthly income, trust in local leaders, and index of
assets.
Educational level is found favourable to WTP. Applied stepwise
generation has displayed three categories built on an educational scale. In
that context, notables with primary level have expressed a higher level than
notables whose educational level was secondary school. It should be noticed,
however, that both trends positively influence WTP towards local leadership.
Moreover, outcomes on the variable deem that notables with academic level
present the highest - of the variable's categories - and significant WTP at
0.05 considering its Wald test. Dror, Radermacher and Koren et al. (2006) have
also found similar trends when assessing WTP for health insurance among rural
and poor person except primary school which was tested adverse.
Notwithstanding, WTP of respondents from 11th class and beyond was
significant and positive. As for Gnimassoun and Anyanwu (2019), their work
confirms that the most Africa will deliver educated migrants; the greater the
impact of diaspora will be experienced across the continent. Other scholars
like Djemaci (2010), Lang (2010), Miwoto et al. (2017) or Houaga (2017) approve
the result. Better is also to view in the outcome a contrasting result with
Bhagwati and Hamada (1974) who professed that brain drain weakens and loses
hope of the rural concerned region.
In the same boat, «monthly income» is investigated
to slightly improve WTP and significant at 0.05. Around USD 0.077 for each
additional dollar earned is consented to be given. Notables are furthermore
affected by their network inside the group. Thus, the most the number of
persons judged of notoriety will raise WTP will as well grow. In contrast,
«Trust in leadership» deeply adversely and meaningfully bears
notables' willingness to pay (a drop of USD 110.70). In another view,
leadership translates a setback toitsown improvement. Kuznetsov (2006) deems
that the most important aspect of remittances is not financial transfers;
governance and monitoring are. Community infrastructure projects need to be
identified, financed, and managed through a network of diverse stakeholders -
municipal government, users of the infrastructure, migrants and others - that
previously had little trust in one another. Torres and Kuznetsov (2001) made
efforts in better use of the receipts. The number of persons of notoriety in
the notables' organization is furthermore favourable to contribution from
notables to the chiefdom's local leadership. It is indirectly to say bearing
local development in the region throught local administration. In the above
table, a mere look at the variable's coefficient persuades one to confirm an
addition of USD 24,24 in one's WTP in case of any supplementary person of
notoriety.
The variable «index of assets» is a
positive predictor. It reflects the wealth value translated in terms of assets
that each notable owns. Besides, outcomes translate a rise of USD
190.77whenever an additional per cent is added on notables' assets. Labii
(2015) previously denoted that the index of assets was positively but not
significantly tied to WTP. So said, the research confirms exactly that index of
assets is one of the impeccable determinants in the process of pooling over the
chiefdom of Ngweshe.
| 
