WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

L'efficacité de la politique monétaire en Haiti (octobre 1996 - septembre 2007)

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Rony TOUSSAINT-FILS
Université Quisqueya - Licence en sciences economiques 2008
  

précédent sommaire

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

ANNEXE

Graphe 1 - Base monétaire

50000
40000
30000
20000
10000
0

 
 

97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07

BASEM ON

Graphe 2 - le taux de change

45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10

 
 

97 98 99 00 0 1 02 03 04 05 0 6 07

TAUXCHANGE

Graphe 3- total des credits

900 800 700 600 500 400 300

 
 

97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 0 5 0 6 07

Graphe 4 - Dépôts gourdes et dépôts dollars

35000
30000
25000
20000
15000
1 0000
5000
0

 
 

97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 0 6 07

DEPDOLL DEPGDES

Graphe 5 - Variation mensuelle de l'IPC

.1 4 .12 .10 .08 .06 .04

.02 .00 -.02

 
 

97 98 99 00 0 1 02 03 04 05 0 6 07

IPC

Graphe 6 - Le niveau de l'inflation (sept 96 - oct 07)

45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10

5

 
 

97 98 99 00 0 1 02 03 04 0 5 0 6 07

INFLATION

Graphe 7- Taux sur les bons BRH

28 24 20 16 12

8

4

 
 

97 98 99 0 0 0 1 02 03 04 0 5 0 6 07

TAUXBON

Tableau 1 - le taux de change (Gdes/ $ 1 U.S)

 

janv

fev

mar

avr

mai

juin

juil

auot

sept

oct

nov

dec

1996

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

15.55

15.27

15.09

1997

16.26

16.11

16.51

16.69

16.82

16.76

16.49

16.75

16.95

17.41

16.87

17.31

1998

17.56

17.38

17.34

16.95

16.69

16.30

16.07

16.51

16.85

16.30

16.59

16.50

1999

16.78

16.89

16.68

16.69

16.70

16.70

16.82

16.80

16.94

17.55

17.96

17.97

2000

18.26

19.18

19.74

19.73

19.67

20.38

20.87

21.63

28.33

23.58

23.89

22.52

2001

23.76

23.55

23.96

23.47

23.52

24.37

24.11

24.42

25.49

26.01

25.96

26.34

2002

26.67

27.20

26.77

26.68

26.97

27.28

28.44

28.76

29.70

32.95

37.27

37.61

2003

41.51

44.52

42.22

42.30

40.54

42.86

42.71

41.22

42.03

41.96

42.82

42.08

2004

44.09

43.00

40.22

37.74

36.95

35.74

36.03

36.10

36.82

37.16

37.48

37.23

2005

37.69

37.89

38.20

39.03

38.70

39.92

42.08

42.34

43.04

43.03

43.06

43.00

2006

43.48

42.98

42.69

41.10

39.02

39.86

39.95

38.86

39.13

39.13

39.00

37.59

2007

38.98

38.32

37.42

36.90

36.57

35.74

35.64

35.76

36.38

 
 
 

TABLEAU 2- le taux d'inflation (%)

 

janv

fev

mars

avr

mai

juin

juil

aout

sept

oct

nov

dec

1996

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

15.71

14.56

14.61

1997

15.07

15.19

16.87

16.38

16.65

16.89

17.25

17.59

16.95

16.68

15.92

15.59

1998

15.71

14.82

12.81

12.79

11.87

10.91

9.74

9.13

8.27

7.50

8.02

7.45

1999

7.38

7.93

7.94

7.45

7.61

8.12

8.74

9.32

9.92

10.10

9.66

9.67

2000

10.02

10.45

12.00

12.29

11.88

11.49

11.65

12.52

15.32

18.03

18.96

18.98

2001

18.57

18.08

16.29

16.19

16.86

16.71

15.99

15.03

12.34

9.52

8.63

8.15

2002

7.99

8.03

8.47

8.51

8.37

8.41

8.91

9.54

10.07

11.91

12.78

14.77

2003

28.88

33.25

36.96

39.25

40.57

41.66

42.03

41.92

42.46

41.23

41.49

40.43

2004

25.83

22.64

20.83

25.37

25.09

24.08

23.04

22.38

22.53

21.98

20.56

20.21

2005

19.79

18.64

17.16

12.60

12.61

14.47

15.04

16.00

14.84

15.24

15.90

15.30

2006

14.50

15.30

15.30

15.10

14.20

13.00

12.60

12.20

12.40

11.80

10.70

10.30

2007

9.60

8.60

8.00

8.00

8.30

9.10

7.90

7.60

7.90

 
 
 

Tableau 3 - les taux sur les bons de 91 jours (%)

 

janv

fev

mar

avr

mai

juin

juil

auot

sept

oct

nov

dec

1996

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

-

19.40

17.20

1997

15.70

15.30

18.10

18.60

18.00

18.00

17.90

17.70

16.30

16.40

17.20

20.50

1998

25.40

25.40

25.40

25.40

25.40

25.40

23.30

21.30

19.70

12.10

9.20

9.80

1999

10.20

10.30

10.20

10.20

10.30

10.30

10.30

10.30

15.30

17.80

21.10

21.10

2000

21.10

23.30

23.30

23.30

23.30

23.30

20.70

20.70

20.70

20.70

20.70

20.70

2001

20.70

20.70

20.70

26.70

26.70

26.70

26.70

26.70

26.70

20.10

19.90

18.90

2002

16.90

15.00

12.00

10.10

9.90

10.00

10.10

10.20

10.30

10.30

15.60

15.60

2003

15.60

24.40

27.80

27.80

27.80

27.80

27.80

27.80

27.80

27.80

27.80

27.80

2004

27.80

 
 

22.20

22.20

20.00

20.00

13.60

7.60

7.50

7.60

7.60

2005

7.60

7.60

7.60

7.60

7.60

13.40

13.40

13.40

15.60

18.90

18.90

18.90

2006

18.90

18.90

18.90

18.90

18.90

17.80

17.80

17.80

17.80

17.80

16.70

16.70

2007

16.70

16.70

15.60

14.50

14.50

13.40

13.30

9.00

8.70

 
 
 

Tableau 4: Résultat des tests de la Racine unitaire

Null Hypothesis: IPC has a unit root

Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=1)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -7.506745 0.0000

Test critical values: 1% level -3.481217

5% level -2.883753

10% level -2.578694

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(IPC)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 10/02/02 Time: 01:05

Sample(adjusted): 1996:12 2007:09

Included observations: 130 after adjusting endpoints

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error t-Statistic

Prob.

IPC(-1)

-0.611841

0.081505 -7.506745

0.0000

C

0.007435

0.001460 5.092944

0.0000

R-squared

0.305673

Mean dependent var

6.99E-05

Adjusted R-squared

0.300249

S.D. dependent var

0.0 14735

S.E. of regression

0.0 12326

Akaike info criterion

-5.939007

Sum squared resid

0.019446

Schwarz criterion

-5.894891

Log likelihood

388.0355

F-statistic

56.35122

Durbin-Watson stat

2.051730

Prob(F-statistic)

0.000000

Null Hypothesis: TB has a unit root

Exogenous: None

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=1)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -7.305058 0.0000

Test critical values: 1% level -2.583593

5% level -1.943406

10% level -1 .615024

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(TB)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 10/02/02 Time: 01:07

Sample(adjusted): 1997:02 2007:09

Included observations: 125

Excluded observations: 3 after adjusting endpoints

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

TB(-1)

-0.751617

0.102890 -7.305058

0.0000

R-squared

0.299916

Mean dependent var

-0.735945

Adjusted R-squared

0.299916

S.D. dependent var

19.97855

S.E. of regression

16.71626

Akaike info criterion

8.478609

Sum squared resid

34649.73

Schwarz criterion

8.501235

Log likelihood

-528.9130

Durbin-Watson stat

1.734391

Null Hypothesis: M2 has a unit root

Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=1)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -11.86448 0.0000

Test critical values: 1% level -3.481217

5% level -2.883753

10% level -2.578694

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(M2)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 10/02/02 Time: 01:08

Sample(adjusted): 1996:12 2007:09

Included observations: 130 after adjusting endpoints

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error t-Statistic

Prob.

M2(-1)

-1.043154

0.087922 -11.86448

0.0000

C

1.106388

0.169377 6.532098

0.0000

R-squared

0.523749

Mean dependent var

0.016157

Adjusted R-squared

0.520028

S.D. dependent var

2.34 1640

S.E. of regression

1.622288

Akaike info criterion

3.820817

Sum squared resid

336.8728

Schwarz criterion

3.864933

Log likelihood

-246.3531

F-statistic

140.7658

Durbin-Watson stat

1.909202

Prob(F-statistic)

0.000000

Null Hypothesis: CRED has a unit root

Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=1)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -1 0.14367 0.0000

Test critical values: 1% level -3.481217

5% level -2.883753

10% level -2.578694

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation Dependent Variable: D(CRED)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 10/02/02 Time: 01:09

Sample(adjusted): 1996:12 2007:09

Included observations: 130 after adjusting endpoints

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error t-Statistic

Prob.

CRED(-1)

-0.891257

0.087863 -10.14367

0.0000

C

1.163183

0.241524 4.816007

0.0000

R-squared

0.445633

Mean dependent var

0.038029

Adjusted R-squared

0.441302

S.D. dependent var

3.272695

S.E. of regression

2.446212

Akaike info criterion

4.642223

Sum squared resid

765.9457

Schwarz criterion

4.686339

Log likelihood

-299.7445

F-statistic

102.8941

Durbin-Watson stat

1.970929

Prob(F-statistic)

0.000000

Null Hypothesis: TXC has a unit root

Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on SIC, MAXLAG=1)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -1 2.42572 0.0000

Test critical values: 1% level -3.481217

5% level -2.883753

10% level -2.578694

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(TXC) Method: Least Squares

Date: 10/02/02 Time: 01:10 Sample(adjusted): 1996:12 2007:09

Included observations: 130 after adjusting endpoints

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error t-Statistic

Prob.

TXC(-1)

-1.092346

0.087910 -12.42572

0.0000

C

0.823786

0.383004 2.150856

0.0334

R-squared

0.546740

Mean dependent var

0.027257

Adjusted R-squared

0.543199

S.D. dependent var

6.370029

S.E. of regression

4.305317

Akaike info criterion

5.772844

Sum squared resid

2372.577

Schwarz criterion

5.816960

Log likelihood

-373.2348

F-statistic

154.3984

Durbin-Watson stat

1.977074

Prob(F-statistic)

0.000000

Vector Autoregression Estimates

Date: 05/28/08 Time: 15:53

Sample(adjusted): 1997:02 2007:09

Included observations: 125

Excluded observations: 3 after adjusting endpoints Standard errors in ( ) & t-statistics in [ ]

 
 

CRED

IPC

M2

TB

TXC

CRED(-1) 0.236254

0.000980

0.160919

1.005831

0.390458

(0.14166)

(0.00064)

(0.09040)

(0.96633)

(0.24792)

[ 1.66772]

[ 1.52937]

[ 1.78014]

[ 1.04088]

[ 1.57496]

IPC(-1) 39.66389

0.334092

26.18289

47.84967

39.57288

(18.1239)

(0.08194)

(11.5651)

(123.630)

(31.7178)

[ 2.18848]

[ 4.07710]

[ 2.26396]

[ 0.38704]

[ 1.24766]

M2(-1) 0.056646

0.001449

-0.116764

1.283891

0.171384

(0.14325)

(0.00065)

(0.09141)

(0.97713)

(0.25069)

[ 0.39545]

[ 2.23730]

[-1 .27741]

[ 1.31394]

[ 0.68366]

TB(-1) -0.003613

0.000203

0.003376

0.225726

0.002762

(0.01508)

(6.8E-05)

(0.00962)

(0.10284)

(0.02638)

[-0.23964]

[ 2.98244]

[ 0.35097]

[ 2.19489]

[ 0.10468]

TXC(-1) -0.142283

-0.000210

-0.038071

0.169990

-0.336910

(0.07928)

(0.00036)

(0.05059)

(0.54079)

(0.13874)

[-1 .79473]

[-0.58589]

[-0.75257]

[ 0.31434]

[-2.42833]

C 0.579521

0.005065

0.720570

-3.737150

-0.034648

(0.34183)

(0.00155)

(0.21813)

(2.33174)

(0.59822)

[ 1.69536]

[ 3.27750]

[ 3.30347]

[-1.60273]

[-0.05792]

R-squared 0.062985

0.285449

0.079848

0.103917

0.056614

Adj. R-squared 0.023614

0.255426

0.041186

0.066266

0.016976

Sum sq. resids 698.5436

0.014280

284.4384

32504.01

2139.414

S.E. equation 2.422832

0.010954

1.546040

16.52704

4.240079

F-statistic 1.599796

9.507635

2.065291

2.760032

1.428270

Log likelihood -284.9101

389.9594

-228.7550

-524.9176

-354.8657

Akaike AIC 4.654561

-6.143350

3.756080

8.494682

5.773851

Schwarz SC 4.790320

-6.007591

3.891839

8.630441

5.909610

Mean dependent 1.284466

0.011693

1.082287

-0.195409

0.826600

S.D. dependent 2.451955

0.012695

1.578896

17.10344

4.276533

Determinant Residual

3.020506

 
 
 

Covariance

 
 
 
 

Log Likelihood (d.f. adjusted)

-955.9256

 
 
 

Akaike Information Criteria

15.77481

 
 
 

Schwarz Criteria

16.45360

 
 
 

Graphique 7 : Fonction des reponses impulsionnelles

Response to Cholesky One S.D. Innovations #177; 2 S.E.

Response of TB to TB

Response of TB to TB Response of TB to M2 Response of TB to CRED Response of TB to TXC Response of TB to IPC

Response of TB to M2

Response of TB to CRED

Response of TB to TXC

Response of TB to IPC

20

20

20

20

20

16

16

16

16

16

12

12

12

12

12

8

8

8

8

8

4

4

4

4

4

0

0

0

0

0

-4

-4

-4

-4

-4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Response of M2 to TB

Response of M2 to M2

Response of M2 to CRED

Response of M2 to TXC

Response of M2 to IPC

Response of M2 to TB Response of M2 to M2 Response of M2 to CRED Response of M2 to TXC Response of M2 to IPC

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

2.0

1.6

1.6

1.6

1.6

1.6

1.2

1.2

1.2

1.2

1.2

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.8

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.4

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

-0.4

-0.4

-0.4

-0.4

-0.4

-0.8

-0.8

-0.8

-0.8

-0.8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Response of CRED to TB

Response of CRED to M2

Response of CRED to CRED

Response of CRED to TXC

Response of CRED to IPC

Response of CRED to TB Response of CRED to M2 Response of CRED to CRED Response of CRED to TXC Response of CRED to IPC

2.8 2.4 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.0 -0.4

2.8 2.4 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.0 -0.4

2.8 2.4 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.0 -0.4

2.8 2.4 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.0 -0.4

2.8 2.4 2.0 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.4 0.0 -0.4

-0.8

-0.8

-0.8

-0.8

-0.8

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Response of TXC to TB

Response of TXC to M2

Response of TXC to IPC

Response of TXC to TB Response of TXC to M2 Response of TXC to CRED Response of TXC to TXC Response of TXC to IPC

Response of TXC to CRED

Response of TXC to TXC

4

4

4

4

4

3

3

3

3

3

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

-1

-1

-1

-1

-1

-2

-2

-2

-2

-2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1

Response of IPC to TB

Response of IPC to M2

Response of IPC to CRED

Response of IPC to TXC

Response of IPC to IPC

Response of IPC to TB Response of IPC to M2 Response of IPC to CRED Response of IPC to TXC Response of IPC to IPC

.012

.012

.012

.012

.012

.008

.008

.008

.008

.008

.004

.004

.004

.004

.004

.000

.000

.000

.000

.000

-.004

-.004

-.004

-.004

-.004

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

précédent sommaire






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Un démenti, si pauvre qu'il soit, rassure les sots et déroute les incrédules"   Talleyrand