WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Impact of tax revenue on economic growth in Rwanda from 2007-2017


par Etienne NZABIRINDA
UR - Masters 2019
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

4.4 UNIT ROOT TEST (TEST FOR STATIONARITY)

Unit Root Test is done to ascertain whether the variables used in the model are normally distributed (stationary) or non-stationary (i.e. have a unit root). This is done using the Augmented Dicker-Fuller (ADF) Test as shown in Table 4.

Table 3: Augmented Dicker-Fuller tests for Unit Root at levels

Variable

AugmentedD
ickey-Fuller
test statistic

MacKinnon(
1996) one
sided
pvalues

1% level
Critical
Value

5% level
Critical
Value

10%level
CriticalV
alue

Stationarity

LNGDP

-2.02191

-3.60099

-2.935

-2.60584

0.2767

Non-stationary

LDT

-2.75693

-3.60559

-2.93694

-2.60686

0.0737

Non-stationary

LTGS

-1.74149

-3.62102

-2.94343

-2.61026

0.4027

Non-stationary

LTITT

-1.27281

-3.59246

-2.9314

-2.60394

0.6336

Non-stationary

P a g e 32 | 48

Source: Author's Computation

All variables have unit roots (i.e. non-stationary) at 5% and 10% levels of significance (as shown in Table 4) and are therefore are subjected to 1st differencing to meet the condition that there should be no unit roots at 5 % and 10% levels of significance. .

Table 5: Augmented Dicker-Fuller tests for Unit Root after 1st differencing

Variable

Augmented Dickey-

Fuller test

statistic

MacKinnon

(1996) one

sided pvalues

1% level

Critical Value

5% level

Critical Value

10% level

Critical Value

Stationarity

LNGDP

-5.42252

0.0001***

-3.60099

-2.935

-2.60584

Stationary

LDT

-8.88959

0.0000***

-3.60559

-2.93694

-2.60686

Stationary

LTGS

-5.42252

0.0000***

-3.60099

-2.935

-2.60584

Stationary

LTITT

-8.0143

0.0000***

-3.59662

-2.93316

-2.60487

Stationary

***p<0.01

Source: Author's Computation

After subjecting all the non-stationary variables to 1st differencing, they all become stationary at 5% and 10% levels of significance (as shown in Table 5). They are therefore integrated of order 1 meaning they are stationary at the 1st difference. The null hypothesis that the variables

have unit roots at first difference is thus rejected and conclusion made that the variables have no unit roots at 1st difference.

4.5 COINTEGRATION TESTS

Cointegration tests facilitate to establish if there is a long-term relationship between the

variables. Subject to proof of cointegration, that will be an indication that the variables share a certain type of behavior in terms of their long-term fluctuations. However before testing for cointegration, the lag length to incorporate in the model will be selected empirically. This will ensure that the model avoids spurious rejection or acceptance of estimated results and to have standard normal error terms that do not suffer from non-stationary, autocorrelation or heteroscedasticity, the results are reported in Section 4.4.1.

P a g e 33 | 48

P a g e 34 | 48

4.6 LAG LENGTH SELECTION CRITERIA

The selection of optimal lag length is used in the estimation of vector autoregressive (VAR)

model. This is important to avoid spurious rejection or acceptance of estimated results. Table 3: Lag length criteria

VAR Lag Order Selection Criteria

Endogenous variables: LGDP LDT LTGS

LTITT

Exogenous variables: C

Date: 11/02/19 Time: 13:20

Sample: 2007Q1 2017Q4

Included observations: 41

Lag

LogL

LR

FPE

AIC

SC

HQ

0

100.9893

NA

1.04e-07

-4.731184

-4.564006

-4.670307

1

227.5260

222.2108*

4.74e-10*

-10.12322*

-9.287330*

-9.818834*

2

241.8056

22.29014

5.28e-10

-10.03930

-8.534698

-9.491405

3

251.0213

12.58728

7.82e-10

-9.708356

-7.535045

-8.916956

* indicates lag order selected by the criterion

LR: sequential modified LR test statistic (each test at 5%

level)

FPE: Final prediction error

AIC: Akaike information criterion

SC: Schwarz information criterion

HQ: Hannan-Quinn information criterion

Table 5 Lag length criteria revealed that researcher should use a maximum of 1 lag in order to

permit adjustment in the model and accomplish well behaved residuals. Table 5 confirms the lag lengths selected by different information criteria such AIC, SIC, Hannan-Quinn Information Criterion (HQI), FPE and the Likelihood Ratio Test (LR) selected three lags, therefore the information criteria approach produced agreeing results to adopt three lags. therefore, the Johansen Cointegration Test is conducted using one lags for the Vector Auto Regression.

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"La première panacée d'une nation mal gouvernée est l'inflation monétaire, la seconde, c'est la guerre. Tous deux apportent une prospérité temporaire, tous deux apportent une ruine permanente. Mais tous deux sont le refuge des opportunistes politiques et économiques"   Hemingway