WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Impact de la dette extérieure sur la croissance économique au Bénin

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Ismaà¯l GNONRONFIN
Université de Parakou - Maà®trise es sciences économiques 2010
  

précédent sommaire

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

Ajayi, I, (1996) « An Analysis of External Debt and Capital Flight in the Severely Indebted Low Income Countries in Sub-Saharan Africa », in External Financing for Low-Income Countries, Zubair Iqbal et Ravi Kanbur (éds) (Washington: FMI).

Arcand J. L., Guillaumont P., Jeanneney S. G. (2000) '' Reforme et croissance en Afrique sont-elles durables? '', Document de Travail CERDI N°11, 27 pp.

Arnaud DEDEHOUANOU « Effets de la dette extérieure sur la croissance économique au Bénin» : FASEG/UAC

Artus P., Morin P. (1991) '' Macro économie Appliquée'' Presses Universitaires de France, Collection Economie, Paris.

Barro R. J. (1974) ½ The Ricardian Approach to Budget Deficits ½ the Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 3, pp 37-54.

Benedict C.; Rina B. et Toan Q. N. (2005) « L'allégement de la dette peut-il doper la croissance des pauvres? » ISBN 1-58906-464-X ISSN 1020-7724 Publié en avril 2005

Bourbonnais R. (2000) «Econométrie», Collection DUNOD, 3ième édition.

Borensztein, E. (1991) «Debt Overhang, Debt Reduction and Investment: the case of the Philippines», Document de travail FMI n° WP/90/77, présenté dans Finances et Développement, pp. 25-27.

Blancheton B. (2004) ''Finances publiques de la France face à la mondialisation: Résistance, transformation et pistes de reforme'', Cahier GRES, N° 13, 17 pp.

Borensztein E. (1990) ''Debt overhang, Credit Rationing and Investment ½ Journal of Development Economics 32½ pp. 315-335.

Borensztein E. (1991) ½ Debt overhang, debt reduction and investment: the case of Philippines½ IMF WP/90/77 September, Washington D.C.

Bougouin A. S., Raffinot M. (2001),'' L'Initiative PPTE et la lutte contre la pauvreté'', EURIsCO novembre, 19 pp.

Camara, M. (2006), « l'évolution des 56 indicateurs de suivi-évaluation de la Stratégie de Réduction de la Pauvreté (SRP) en Guinée » GTZ, MEF.

Chavagneux (2001) « La lutte contre la pauvreté ; les enjeux politiques d'un slogan », Politique africaine, n° juin, pp 121-123

Clements, Benedict et al (2005) « L'allègement de la dette peut-il doper la croissance? », Dossier économique N°34 du FMI;

Claaessens. S. (1993) « Risk Management in Developing Countries ». Document technique de la Banque mondiale no 235 (Washington : Banque mondiale).

Conte B. (2003) « les origines de la crise de la dette extérieure, université de Bordeaux, pp4

Dittus P. (1989), « The budgetary dimension of the debt crisis in low-income sub-Saharan countries», Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, n°145, pp. 358-366.

Eichengreen B., Richard P. (1986) ½Debt and Default in the 1930: Causes and Consequences''European Economic Review, Washington.

Geske D. and Hermes N., (2001) «The Uncertainty of Debt Service Payments and Economic Growth of Highly Indebted Poor Countries: Is There a Case for Debt Relief? » Helsinki United Nations University.

Gürbüz B., Raffinot M. (2001) « Dette publique et investissements privés. Le cas de la Turquie ». Economie Internationale n°86, 2ème trimestre. CEPII

Idlemouden K, Raffinot M. (2005) « Le fardeau virtuel de la dette extérieur », Cahiers de recherche EURISCO, n°3, Université Paris Dauphine

Johnson ALISON (2001), Key issues for analysing domestic debt sustainability, Debt International Ltd, 22p.

Krugman P. (1988a) « Financing vs. Forgiving a Debt Overhang. » NBER Working Paper n° 2486, Janvier 1988.

Lawin Kotchikpa « Analyse des déterminants de l'endettement extérieur public des pays à faible revenu : Cas du Bénin» Mémoire de fin de formation pour l'obtention du Master en Economie publique et statistique appliquée : IREEP

Léonce YAPO, (2002) « Les déterminants de la dette extérieure des PPTE : cas de la Côte d'Ivoire », World Institute for Development Economic Research (WIDER), Discussion paper N°2002/14;

Létondé F. Brice H. (2004) « Analyse de la soutenabilité de la dette extérieure du Bénin ». Mémoire de maîtrise sciences économique: FASEG/UAC.

Loubelo E. (2002) '' Croissance et épargne face à l'endettement extérieur des pays en développement: le cas de la République du Gabon'', Annales de l'Université Marien N'Gouabi, Vol 3, Afrique édition.

Obadan, I. M (2004) « Foreign Capital Flows and External Deb Perspectives on Nigeria, and LDCs Group». Ibaban (Nigeria), National Centre for Economic Management and Administration (NCEMA).

Ojo KENNETH O. (1989) «Debt capacity model of Sub-Saharan African: Economic Issues and Perspectives » Development Policy Review, vol 7. Washington.

OXFAM INTERNATIONAL (2000), Make debt relief work: Proposal for the G-7, London

Pattillo, C, Poirson H. and Ricci L., (2002) « External Debt and Growth », IMF Working-Paper n°02/69.

Pattillo C., Poirson H. and Ricci L. (2004) « What Are the Channels Through Which External Debt Affects Growth? ». IMF Working Paper WP/04/15. Janvier

Piriou, J. P. (2003) « Lexique des sciences économiques et sociales », Découvertes, 6ème édition, Paris

Raffinot M. (1998) « Soutenabilité de la dette extérieure. De la théorie aux modèles d'évaluation pour les pays à faible revenu », Document de travail du DIAL, n°1.

Sachs J. (1988) ½the debt overhang of developing countries'', in Debt, Stabilization and development: essays in memory of Carlos Diaz Alejandro, Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

TEST DE RACINE UNITAIRE SUR LES VARIABLES

LDTPIB

ADF Test Statistic

-3.085955

1% Critical Value*

-3.6752

 
 

5% Critical Value

-2.9665

 
 

10% Critical Value

-2.6220

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(LDTPIB)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/09/10 Time: 03:06

Sample(adjusted): 1981 2009

Included observations: 29 after adjusting endpoints

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

LDTPIB(-1)

-0.498009

0.161379

-3.085955

0.0048

D(LDTPIB(-1))

0.079267

0.179877

0.440673

0.6631

C

26.58558

8.489976

3.131408

0.0043

R-squared

0.280969

Mean dependent var

0.660000

Adjusted R-squared

0.225659

S.D. dependent var

8.543750

S.E. of regression

7.518213

Akaike info criterion

6.970231

Sum squared resid

1469.612

Schwarz criterion

7.111676

Log likelihood

-98.06835

F-statistic

5.079893

Durbin-Watson stat

2.079064

Prob(F-statistic)

0.013731

LVTE

ADF Test Statistic

-1.226812

1% Critical Value*

-2.6560

 
 

5% Critical Value

-1.9546

 
 

10% Critical Value

-1.6226

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(LVTE)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/09/10 Time: 03:09

Sample(adjusted): 1984 2009

Included observations: 26 after adjusting endpoints

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

LVTE(-1)

-0.103017

0.083972

-1.226812

0.2335

D(LVTE(-1))

-0.420103

0.186753

-2.249509

0.0353

D(LVTE(-2))

-0.125248

0.203387

-0.615810

0.5446

D(LVTE(-3))

-0.190807

0.203510

-0.937580

0.3591

D(LVTE(-4))

-0.479860

0.183359

-2.617054

0.0161

R-squared

0.436910

Mean dependent var

-0.013192

Adjusted R-squared

0.329654

S.D. dependent var

0.274794

S.E. of regression

0.224987

Akaike info criterion

0.025489

Sum squared resid

1.062998

Schwarz criterion

0.267430

Log likelihood

4.668646

F-statistic

4.073546

Durbin-Watson stat

1.846654

Prob(F-statistic)

0.013437

OUVC

ADF Test Statistic

-3.355620

1% Critical Value*

-3.6959

 
 

5% Critical Value

-2.9750

 
 

10% Critical Value

-2.6265

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(OUVC)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/02/10 Time: 18:46

Sample(adjusted): 1983 2009

Included observations: 27 after adjusting endpoints

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

OUVC(-1)

-0.854275

0.254580

-3.355620

0.0029

D(OUVC(-1))

-0.014060

0.223718

-0.062847

0.9505

D(OUVC(-2))

-0.120136

0.197507

-0.608259

0.5492

D(OUVC(-3))

-0.177260

0.181986

-0.974034

0.3406

C

0.375312

0.115824

3.240364

0.0038

R-squared

0.527184

Mean dependent var

-0.00625

Adjusted R-squared

0.441217

S.D. dependent var

0.068257

S.E. of regression

0.051023

Akaike info criterion

-2.94748

Sum squared resid

0.057275

Schwarz criterion

-2.70751

Log likelihood

44.79108

F-statistic

6.132431

Durbin-Watson stat

1.981555

Prob(F-statistic)

0.001795

LSDEXP

ADF Test Statistic

-4.580375

1% Critical Value*

-4.3382

 
 

5% Critical Value

-3.5867

 
 

10% Critical Value

-3.2279

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(LSDEXP)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/09/10 Time: 03:12

Sample(adjusted): 1983 2009

Included observations: 27 after adjusting endpoints

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

LSDEXP(-1)

-1.270375

0.277352

-4.580375

0.0002

D(LSDEXP(-1))

0.486564

0.212012

2.294978

0.0321

D(LSDEXP(-2))

0.382425

0.185229

2.064610

0.0515

D(LSDEXP(-3))

0.141407

0.128139

1.103544

0.2823

C

42.74743

11.77601

3.630045

0.0016

@TREND(1979)

-1.470261

0.436280

-3.369997

0.0029

R-squared

0.614294

Mean dependent var

-2.000000

Adjusted R-squared

0.522460

S.D. dependent var

10.32613

S.E. of regression

7.135801

Akaike info criterion

6.961256

Sum squared resid

1069.313

Schwarz criterion

7.249220

Log likelihood

-87.97696

F-statistic

6.689134

Durbin-Watson stat

1.993491

Prob(F-statistic)

0.000715

LTCH

ADF Test Statistic

-2.569766

1% Critical Value*

-4.3082

 
 

5% Critical Value

-3.5731

 
 

10% Critical Value

-3.2203

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(LTCH)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/02/10 Time: 18:52

Sample(adjusted): 1981 2009

Included observations: 29 after adjusting endpoints

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

LTCH(-1)

-0.399648

0.155519

-2.569766

0.0165

D(LTCH(-1))

0.248830

0.193782

1.284068

0.2109

C

92.89575

41.79676

2.222559

0.0355

@TREND(1979)

6.602758

3.001846

2.199566

0.0373

R-squared

0.210878

Mean dependent var

18.32955

Adjusted R-squared

0.116183

S.D. dependent var

77.22211

S.E. of regression

72.59768

Akaike info criterion

11.53518

Sum squared resid

131760.6

Schwarz criterion

11.72378

Log likelihood

-163.2602

F-statistic

2.226927

Durbin-Watson stat

2.075819

Prob(F-statistic)

0.109919

LTCROIS

ADF Test Statistic

0.088397

1% Critical Value*

-2.6560

 
 

5% Critical Value

-1.9546

 
 

10% Critical Value

-1.6226

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(LTCROIS)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/02/10 Time: 18:55

Sample(adjusted): 1984 2009

Included observations: 26 after adjusting endpoints

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

LTCROIS(-1)

0.010954

0.123917

0.088397

0.9304

D(LTCROIS(-1))

-0.750194

0.193245

-3.882088

0.0009

D(LTCROIS(-2))

-0.650958

0.181351

-3.589493

0.0017

D(LTCROIS(-3))

-0.368778

0.177829

-2.073777

0.0506

D(LTCROIS(-4))

-0.051196

0.156088

-0.327997

0.7462

R-squared

0.567326

Mean dependent var

0.388462

Adjusted R-squared

0.484912

S.D. dependent var

3.468178

S.E. of regression

2.489099

Akaike info criterion

4.832760

Sum squared resid

130.1079

Schwarz criterion

5.074701

Log likelihood

-57.82588

F-statistic

6.883849

Durbin-Watson stat

1.395181

Prob(F-statistic)

0.001052

LTDB

ADF Test Statistic

-3.625350

1% Critical Value*

-3.7076

 
 

5% Critical Value

-2.9798

 
 

10% Critical Value

-2.6290

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(LTDB)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/02/10 Time: 18:57

Sample(adjusted): 1984 2009

Included observations: 26 after adjusting endpoints

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

LTDB(-1)

-1.818009

0.501471

-3.625350

0.0017

D(LTDB(-1))

0.870805

0.398389

2.185818

0.0409

D(LTDB(-2))

0.430400

0.336844

1.277743

0.2160

D(LTDB(-3))

0.292368

0.246758

1.184835

0.2500

D(LTDB(-4))

0.022514

0.197517

0.113986

0.9104

C

0.174387

0.047366

3.681672

0.0015

R-squared

0.620198

Mean dependent var

0.003735

Adjusted R-squared

0.525248

S.D. dependent var

0.093037

S.E. of regression

0.064105

Akaike info criterion

-2.45742

Sum squared resid

0.082188

Schwarz criterion

-2.16709

Log likelihood

37.94655

F-statistic

6.531808

Durbin-Watson stat

2.203523

Prob(F-statistic)

0.000939

LTINVP

ADF Test Statistic

-1.243240

1% Critical Value*

-2.6522

 
 

5% Critical Value

-1.9540

 
 

10% Critical Value

-1.6223

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(LTINVP)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/02/10 Time: 18:59

Sample(adjusted): 1983 2009

Included observations: 27 after adjusting endpoints

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

LTINVP(-1)

-0.046283

0.037228

-1.243240

0.2263

D(LTINVP(-1))

0.199346

0.156983

1.269855

0.2168

D(LTINVP(-2))

0.132731

0.160546

0.826745

0.4169

D(LTINVP(-3))

-0.259381

0.158720

-1.634202

0.1158

R-squared

0.207184

Mean dependent var

-0.17377

Adjusted R-squared

0.103773

S.D. dependent var

1.464205

S.E. of regression

1.386152

Akaike info criterion

3.626894

Sum squared resid

44.19259

Schwarz criterion

3.818869

Log likelihood

-44.96306

F-statistic

2.003506

Durbin-Watson stat

2.361855

Prob(F-statistic)

0.141565

TEST DE DIFFERENCE PREMIERE

LVTE

ADF Test Statistic

-4.515462

1% Critical Value*

-2.6560

 
 

5% Critical Value

-1.9546

 
 

10% Critical Value

-1.6226

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(LVTE,2)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/02/10 Time: 19:20

Sample(adjusted): 1984 2009

Included observations: 26 after adjusting endpoints

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

D(LVTE(-1))

-2.327662

0.515487

-4.515462

0.0002

D(LVTE(-1),2)

0.859382

0.440491

1.950964

0.0639

D(LVTE(-2),2)

0.710089

0.330578

2.148025

0.0430

D(LVTE(-3),2)

0.496782

0.184926

2.686377

0.0135

R-squared

0.790544

Mean dependent var

-0.002115

Adjusted R-squared

0.761981

S.D. dependent var

0.466423

S.E. of regression

0.227554

Akaike info criterion

0.017784

Sum squared resid

1.139183

Schwarz criterion

0.211337

Log likelihood

3.768811

F-statistic

27.67795

Durbin-Watson stat

1.823795

Prob(F-statistic)

0.000000

LTCH

ADF Test Statistic

-3.583023

1% Critical Value*

-2.6486

 
 

5% Critical Value

-1.9535

 
 

10% Critical Value

-1.6221

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(LTCH,2)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/02/10 Time: 19:23

Sample(adjusted): 1982 2009

Included observations: 28 after adjusting endpoints

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

D(LTCH(-1))

-0.945562

0.263901

-3.583023

0.0014

D(LTCH(-1),2)

0.047496

0.196244

0.242026

0.8107

R-squared

0.451881

Mean dependent var

0.796714

Adjusted R-squared

0.430799

S.D. dependent var

108.6325

S.E. of regression

81.95820

Akaike info criterion

11.71904

Sum squared resid

174645.8

Schwarz criterion

11.81420

Log likelihood

-162.0666

F-statistic

21.43493

Durbin-Watson stat

1.969431

Prob(F-statistic)

0.000089

LTCROIS

ADF Test Statistic

-3.991906

1% Critical Value*

-2.6603

 
 

5% Critical Value

-1.9552

 
 

10% Critical Value

-1.6228

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(LTCROIS,2)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/02/10 Time: 19:25

Sample(adjusted): 1985 2009

Included observations: 25 after adjusting endpoints

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

D(LTCROIS(-1))

-2.735245

0.685198

-3.991906

0.0007

D(LTCROIS(-1),2)

1.239933

0.559953

2.214351

0.0386

D(LTCROIS(-2),2)

0.784628

0.406129

1.931969

0.0677

D(LTCROIS(-3),2)

0.387179

0.251831

1.537454

0.1399

D(LTCROIS(-4),2)

0.291354

0.128948

2.259464

0.0352

R-squared

0.854822

Mean dependent var

-0.46000

Adjusted R-squared

0.825787

S.D. dependent var

4.901615

S.E. of regression

2.045878

Akaike info criterion

4.446388

Sum squared resid

83.71237

Schwarz criterion

4.690163

Log likelihood

-50.57985

F-statistic

29.44055

Durbin-Watson stat

1.705903

Prob(F-statistic)

0.000000

LTINVP

ADF Test Statistic

-3.870039

1% Critical Value*

-2.6603

 
 

5% Critical Value

-1.9552

 
 

10% Critical Value

-1.6228

*MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of a unit root.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(LTINVP,2)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/02/10 Time: 19:29

Sample(adjusted): 1985 2009

Included observations: 25 after adjusting endpoints

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

D(LTINVP(-1))

-1.589420

0.410699

-3.870039

0.0010

D(LTINVP(-1),2)

0.537250

0.318345

1.687636

0.1070

D(LTINVP(-2),2)

0.494413

0.243170

2.033197

0.0555

D(LTINVP(-3),2)

0.291759

0.226833

1.286228

0.2131

D(LTINVP(-4),2)

0.167241

0.177500

0.942206

0.3573

R-squared

0.595743

Mean dependent var

-0.07544

Adjusted R-squared

0.514891

S.D. dependent var

2.032673

S.E. of regression

1.415752

Akaike info criterion

3.710055

Sum squared resid

40.08707

Schwarz criterion

3.953830

Log likelihood

-41.37569

F-statistic

7.368354

Durbin-Watson stat

1.843026

Prob(F-statistic)

0.000811

TEST DE COINTEGRATION DE JOHANSEN

Date: 07/09/10 Time: 03:18

Sample: 1979 2009

Included observations: 29

Test assumption: No deterministic trend in the data

 
 
 
 

Series: LDTPIB LSDEXP LTCH LVTE LTDB LTINVP LTCROIS OUVC

Lags interval: 1 to 1

 

Likelihood

5 Percent

1 Percent

Hypothesized

Eigenvalue

Ratio

Critical Value

Critical Value

No. of CE(s)

0.961186

227.0038

141.20

152.32

None **

0.811350

132.7838

109.99

119.80

At most 1 **

0.730885

84.41589

82.49

90.45

At most 2 *

0.520835

46.35002

59.46

66.52

At most 3

0.366963

25.01442

39.89

45.58

At most 4

0.249914

11.75487

24.31

29.75

At most 5

0.107415

3.415417

12.53

16.31

At most 6

0.004131

0.120041

3.84

6.51

At most 7

*(**) denotes rejection of the hypothesis at 5%(1%) significance level

 
 
 
 

L.R. test indicates 3 cointegrating equation(s) at 5% significance level

 
 
 
 

Test de normalité de JARQUE BERA sur les résidus

JARQUE-BERA

1,766126

PROBABILITE

0,413432

MODELE DE LONG TERME PAR LES MCO

Dependent Variable: LDTPIB

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/09/10 Time: 03:20

Sample: 1979 2009

Included observations: 31

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

C

-1.719890

13.85905

-0.124099

0.9023

LSDEXP

-0.089074

0.118546

-0.751390

0.4600

LTCH

0.019767

0.009903

1.996034

0.0579

LVTE

-21.61966

6.089689

-3.550207

0.0017

LTDB

61.03351

23.07628

2.644859

0.0145

LTINVP

1.509426

0.620032

2.434434

0.0231

LTCROIS

-1.660350

0.533391

-3.112818

0.0049

OUVC

105.7529

27.81999

3.801327

0.0009

R-squared

0.636637

Mean dependent var

51.61129

Adjusted R-squared

0.526049

S.D. dependent var

9.744773

S.E. of regression

6.708703

Akaike info criterion

6.862324

Sum squared resid

1035.154

Schwarz criterion

7.232386

Log likelihood

-98.36603

F-statistic

5.756806

Durbin-Watson stat

2.079579

Prob(F-statistic)

0.000611



TEST DE WHITE

White Heteroskedasticity Test:

F-statistic

1.974851

Probability

0.096420

Obs*R-squared

19.63634

Probability

0.142030

TEST DE RAMSEY

Variables

Coefficient

T-statistic

Probabilité

Significativité

FITTED^2

-0.004297

-0,201455

0,8422

Non significatif

MODELE A CORRECTION D'ERREURS

Dependent Variable: D(LDTPIB)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/09/10 Time: 03:26

Sample(adjusted): 1980 2009

Included observations: 30 after adjusting endpoints

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

C

4.180491

10.56427

0.395720

0.6983

D(LSDEXP)

-0.073339

0.088859

-0.825345

0.4230

D(LTCH)

0.037642

0.011188

3.364585

0.0046

D(LVTE)

-14.01593

5.906618

-2.372920

0.0325

D(LTDB)

34.96756

19.28288

1.813399

0.0913

D(LTINVP)

2.349736

0.794935

2.955884

0.0104

D(LTCROIS)

-1.069747

0.347164

-3.081387

0.0081

D(OUVC)

69.14272

18.20255

3.798519

0.0020

LDTPIB(-1)

-0.860276

0.180627

-4.762726

0.0003

LSDEXP(-1)

-0.170475

0.118112

-1.443339

0.1709

LTCH(-1)

3.17E-06

0.008492

0.000374

0.9997

LVTE(-1)

-26.49452

7.902862

-3.352522

0.0047

LTDB(-1)

98.61886

29.56400

3.335775

0.0049

LTINVP(-1)

1.934172

0.640802

3.018360

0.0092

LTCROIS(-1)

-1.268297

0.597106

-2.124075

0.0520

OUVC(-1)

87.92755

25.44747

3.455258

0.0039

R-squared

0.905757

Mean dependent var

0.619667

Adjusted R-squared

0.804782

S.D. dependent var

8.398058

S.E. of regression

3.710554

Akaike info criterion

5.764766

Sum squared resid

192.7549

Schwarz criterion

6.512071

Log likelihood

-70.47149

F-statistic

8.970129

Durbin-Watson stat

2.191412

Prob(F-statistic)

0.000093


TEST DE CAUSALITE DE GRANGER

Pairwise Granger Causality Tests

Date: 05/18/11 Time: 10:17

Sample: 1979 2009

Lags: 1

Null Hypothesis:

Obs

F-Statistic

Probability

LSDEXP does not Granger Cause LDTPIB

30

0.01079

0.91805

LDTPIB does not Granger Cause LSDEXP

0.03544

0.85208

LTCH does not Granger Cause LDTPIB

30

0.63787

0.43145

LDTPIB does not Granger Cause LTCH

0.16643

0.68652

LTCROIS does not Granger Cause LDTPIB

30

1.46287

0.23696

LDTPIB does not Granger Cause LTCROIS

1.56490

0.22168

LTDB does not Granger Cause LDTPIB

30

5.96955

0.02138

LDTPIB does not Granger Cause LTDB

0.03669

0.84953

LTINVP does not Granger Cause LDTPIB

30

1.08148

0.30759

LDTPIB does not Granger Cause LTINVP

2.27777

0.14286

LVTE does not Granger Cause LDTPIB

30

0.04521

0.83321

LDTPIB does not Granger Cause LVTE

12.1219

0.00171

OUVC does not Granger Cause LDTPIB

30

0.01897

0.89147

LDTPIB does not Granger Cause OUVC

2.33059

0.13848

ESTIMATION DE DONNEES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Années

Ltcrois

Lsdexp

Ltinvp

Ldtpib

LTch

Lvte

Ltdb

Ouvc

1979

6,5

49,5

5,47

34,36

225,66

0,87

0,087

0,546

1980

6,8

14,9

5,22

33,81

212,72

0,8

0,05478

0,5319

1981

10

58,4

5,55

35,73

211,28

0,86

0,0199

0,598

1982

2,2

58,6

10,6

50,25

271,73

0,86

0,00209

0,5779

1983

-4,3

35,8

12,63

55,33

328,61

0,93

0,0059

0,4544

1984

7,9

23,4

14,53

48,91

381,61

0,96

0,0419

0,5052

1985

7,5

8,5

12,31

54,58

436,96

0,69

0,389

0,3895

1986

2,2

18,6

9,71

75,83

449,26

0,85

0,176

0,4928

1987

-1,5

24,59

5,84

58,1

300,5

0,03

0,0147

0,461

1988

3,4

30,24

7,15

61

297,8

0,21

0,0626

0,4587

1989

-2,9

48,75

5,57

49,87

319

0,37

0,0648

0,3835

1990

3,2

11,9

5,04

45,44

272,3

0,41

0,1364

0,425

1991

4,7

8,5

5,03

50,32

282,1

0,87

0,1016

0,4762

1992

4

12,63

4,05

47,33

264,7

0,14

0,081

0,4068

1993

3,5

16,38

4,43

49,89

283,2

0,33

0,0968

0,3872

1994

4,4

10,28

6,02

70,82

546,95

0,42

0,06665

0,5193

1995

4,6

8,02

7,22

64,93

499,1

0,29

0,1137

0,533

1996

5,5

6,76

5,94

62,69

511,6

0,47

0,1484

0,4522

1997

6,1

9,15

6,32

56,52

583,7

0,31

0,1062

0,4492

1998

4,5

8,68

5,35

53,27

590

0,33

0,09994

0,4449

1999

4,7

10,27

5,77

55,33

615,7

0,25

0,047

0,4496

2000

5,8

8,33

6,93

54,2

712

0,35

0,0608

0,4258

2001

5

4,76

5,45

53,18

733

0,3

0,0838

0,4304

2002

4,5

4,63

4,9

48,12

697

0,25

0,0511

0,4012

2003

3,9

3,78

6,57

40,27

581,2

0,66

0,0724

0,3822

2004

3,1

3,6

6,12

38,61

528,3

0,67

0,085

0,3473

2005

2,9

3,17

6,27

40

527,5

0,67

0,0987

0,4523

2006

3,8

3,01

4,9

52,68

522,9

0,6

0,078

0,54587

2007

4,6

3,58

5,882

52,77

702,54

0,556

0,11691

0,4153

2008

5,1

4,8

5,894

52,86

723,41

0,572

0,1288

0,4122

2009

5,8

4,6

5,908

52,95

744,28

0,587

0,103

0,4092

précédent sommaire










Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy



"Qui vit sans folie n'est pas si sage qu'il croit."   La Rochefoucault