REFERENCES BIBLIOGRAPHIQUES
Arrow K., Solow R., Portney P.R., Leamer E.E., Radner
R. et Schuman H . (1993), «Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent
Valuation», Technical Report n°58, January, pp. 1601-1614.
Barde J-P. (1992), Economie et Politique de
l'Environnement, 2emeédition refondue, Presse
Universitaires de France.
Bergstrom J.C. (1990), «Concepts and
measures of the economic value of environmental quality: a review»,
Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 31, pp. 215-228.
Bonnieux F. (1998), Principes, mise en
oeuvre et limites de l'évaluation contingente, Economie Publique,
Etudes et Recherches, n°1, p 47-83.
Carson R .T. (1999), «Contingent Valuation:
A User's Guide», University of San Diego, 24p. (Discussion paper
99-26).
Cummings R.G. et Taylor L.O. (1999),
Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for
the Contingent Valuation Method, American Economic Review,
n° 89, pp. 649665.
Davis R .K. (1963), « Recreating Planning
as an Economic Problem », Natural Resources Journal,n°3,pp.239-249,
in Luchini Stephane, dans la Singularité de la
méthode d'Evaluation Contingente, Economie et Statistique
N°357-358, 2002 .
Flachaire E., Hollard G. et Luchini S. (2002),
« A New Approach to Anchoring: Theory and Empirical Evidence from a
Contingent Valuation Survey », document de travail présenté
au séminaire de l'Eurequa en novembre 2002.
Grobras, J.M,( 1987) « Méthodes
statistiques des sondages », Collection «Economie et statistiques
avancées»; Editions Economica
Glazer J. et Rubinstein A. (1997), «
Debates and Decisions: On a Rationale of Argumentation Rules », document
de travail n° 17.97, Université de Tel-Aviv.
Hollard G. et Luchini S. (1999), «
Théories du choix social et représentations : une analyse
à partir d'une enquête en Camargue », document de travail
n° 99b06, GREQAM
Jorgensen B.S., Syme G.J., Bishop B.J. et Nancarrow B.E.
(1999), « Protest Responses in Contingent Valuation »,
Environmental and Resources Economics, n° 14, pp. 131-150.
Karni E. et Mongin P. (2000), «On the
Determination of Subjective Probability by Choices», Management
Science, n° 46, pp. 233-248.
Laffont, J.J. (1982), Cours de
théorie Micro-Economique, Vol .1( Fondements de l'Economie publique)
,Economica : Paris.
Luchini S. (2002), « De la
singularité de la méthode d'évaluation contingente »,
Economie et Statistique N°357-358
34
Luchini S. (2000), Révélation
des préférences dans des environnements non marchands :
application au cas des actifs environnementaux, Thèse de Doctorat,
Université de la Méditerranée, GREQAM, Marseille.
Milanesi Julien, (2007), « la
méthode d'évaluation contingente en question, »Thèse
de Doctorat en sciences économiques, Université de Pau et des
Pays de l'Adour
Mitchell, R.C et Carson, R.T. (1989), Using
Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for
the Future: Washington D.C
Munasinghe, M., et E. Lutz. (1993),
«Environmental Economics and Valuation in Development
Decisionmaking», in Munasinghe, Mohan, Ed.,Environmental Economics and
Natural Resource Management in Developing Countries, CIDIE,Wachington D.C.: The
World Bank.
N'guessan C.F.J. (2008), le consentement des
ménages ruraux à payer une prime d'assurance maladie en
Côte d'Ivoire, Revue d'économie du développement, Vol 22
2008/1, p 101 à 124, De Boeck Université.
Pigou A. C. (1932), The Economics of
Welfare.Londres, MacMilan, 875p. (4eme édition).
Portney P. et Weyant J. (1999), Discounting
and Intergenerational Equity. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the
Future.
Portnay P.R. (1994), «The Contingent
Valuation Debate:Why Economists Should Care ?», Journal of Economic
Perspective,n°8, pp.3-17..
Rainelli P. (1993), « Evaluation
Contingente et context institutionnel », in P. Point,
Bonnieux F et G.
Rozan A. (1999), Contingent Valuation of health
benefits induced by air pollution: The example of the region of Strasbourg,
ph.d Thesis, University Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg.
Schkade D. A., et John W. P.(1994), « How
People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: AVerbal Protocol Analysis of
Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation», Journal of
Environmental Economics and Management 26, (1994): 88-109.
Stevens T.H., Echeverria J., Glass R.J., Hager T.et More
T.A. (1991), « Measuring the Existence Value of
Wild Life: What do CVM Estimates Really Show? », Land Economics,
n° 67, pp. 390-400.
ANNEXES
35
36
Annexe 1 : Questionnaire de
l'enquête Introduction:
This questionnaire is formulated for the purpose of a training
course for a Master degree at PID (Pan African Institute for Development), and
is entitled «Application of the contingent valuation method to measure the
demand and to plan school investments in under-scholarized areas: Case of
MBORORO populations of the North West region». Information collected will
be held confidential and will be used at exclusive ends of scientific and
academic research. Hence, the exactitude of your answers is an essential
element for the success of this work. Thank you for your patience and
contribution.
Name of the interviewer:
Date :
Sub-division :
A- INFORMATIONS ON THE PARENT
Sex: M F
Age: _________ years
Profession: Grazer Farmer Other (Indicate : )
Marital situation: Married Divorced Widow
Matrimonial regime : Polygamous Monogamous
Religious confession of the household Muslims Christians
Animist
What is your level of education?
Primary school Secondary school University Non - scholirized
A-1/ How many children do you have? :
A-2/ Do you have a concern with the education
of your children(Y/N)? Yes NO
A-3/ Do you give importance to the quality of
this education(Y/N)? Yes NO
A-4/ How many school going age children do you
have? - Boys : ___
-Girls : ___
A-5/ How many children do you have who are
effectively going to school? - Boys : ___
-Girls : ___
B- INFORMATIONS ON THE EDUCATION BEHAVIOUR OF PARENTS
B-1/ Do you know the number of primary schools
in your locality(Y/N)? Yes NO
B-2/ Do you know the number of secondary general
schools in your locality(Y/N)? Yes NO
B-3/ Do you know the number of secondary
technical schools in your locality(Y/N)? Yes NO
B-4/ Do you know the number of Koranic schools
in your locality(Y/N)? Yes NO
II- 1 Primary education
B15/ How many children do you have in primary
school? - Boys : ___
-Girls : ___
B-16/ How far are these schools from your
house?
Nearer A bit far Far
B-17/ By which means do
your children go to school?
On foot By car There are in the dormitory Other (Indicate : )
B-18/ Do your children (those who go to school)
have basic school needs (text books, exercise books, pens etc)?
All basic needs Some basic needs Non e of the basic needs
B-19/ How many of your children have completed
their primary school? - Boys : ___
-Girls : ___
37
B-20/ If then umbers above are low, which
reasons can you evoke to justify this situation?
? For boys :
(a) You lack financial means .
(b) Are your children affected by transhumance? .
(c) The family loads are too high
(d) It is not necessary for them to obtain the FSLC
? For girls :
(a) You lack financial means
(b) The girl child education is not important
(c) Your daughters must go on marriage .
(d) The family loads are too high
(e) It is not necessary for them to obtain the FSLC ..
B-21/ Are you member of the PTA of your
children's school (Y/N)? Yes NO
B-22/ How are the decisions taken during the
meetings? They are imposed By vote
B-23/ Do you think you can influence these
decisions, notably those concerning finances(Y/N)? Yes NO
| 
