WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Le droit de la propriété intellectuelle sur internet


par Carine Jezequel, Alexandra Lemmenicier et Ludovic Blin
Université Paris Dauphine - DESS 226 1999
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

3) Moral right

The moral right guarantees to the author that its work will not be deformed, and that its paternity on this one will constantly be recognized. In French right, the moral rights have the characteristic to be perpetual and inalienable. Only the author of alive sound, then its heirs after his death, have the possibility of asserting them. This right is made up of the right of first disclosure and the right to the respect of the name and the integrity of work.

The right of first disclosure implies that only the author can make public his work, and to authorize the exploitation of it. It will thus have reached there with the moral right, since the digitalization of a work or its diffusion on Internet will have been carried out without the agreement of the author.

Right to the respect of the name of the author and quality of work aim to ensure the paternity of a work its author and to protect it in his integrity, in order to prevent that it is denatured, modified or deteriorated. However digitalization facilitates handling and transformations, that it is of a text, of an image or of a music, which results in to distort the knowledge of work such as it was created.

An abuse the right of quotation can also cause a denaturation of work or a diversion compared to its direction first. For example, a portion of photography within a site of which the subject does not have anything with the latter in common, would correspond to a mutilation of photography. It y then reached with the moral right of the author since the use which is made work does not make it possible to give an account as a whole initial of it.

In the same way, the infringement of the moral right, via the quotation, can meet on the network through certain bonds hypertexts. The danger lies in the possibility of using information taken out of its context, with the profit of a site without relationship with the precedent, and that without same as the user does not realize there. On this subject, certain suppliers of lodging of Web pages make appear a warning authorizing this type of connection only with the level of the first page (of reception), but prohibiting the bonds returning to other elements.

· Differences between the French right and the Anglo-Saxon right

Two designs of the royalty clash : the Anglo-Saxon design which prevails in Great Britain, with the United States, in Australia and Zealand News and the European and continental design (and of French origin) which prevails in France, in Belgium, in Spain, in Portugal, in Italy and also in Germany, in Austria, in Switzerland and in the Scandinavian countries.

Royalty Anglo-Saxon, called « copyright », work compares to goods whose creator is dispossessed when it yields it, whereas, as we have just shown it, the French right grants to the author of the inalienable moral rights on the fruit of its work.

The concept of copyright, near to that of the patent, is based on principles much more pragmatic than the royalty and stresses the propagation of work. Here the principal differences which one can raise :

Whereas in France, the right is born from creation, the Anglo-Saxon countries have a legislation much more formal than ours : the author profits from rights only as from the moment when it recorded his work near an organization envisaged to this end. In the United States, the omission of the deposit and recording do not deprive the author of protection but failing to conform to it, it is not possible to act as counterfeit.

In France the contracts are strongly framed by the law, whereas in the Anglo-Saxon countries, and especially in the United States, they are regulated little.

The criterion of originality, from which is born protection, is more strict in France than in the United States where work must simply not be copied and to reveal a minimum of creativity.

While being based on the economic dimension of work and by not recognizing moral right to an author, the Anglo-Saxon concept of copyright undoubtedly is adapted better to the diffusion of works on Internet, because it seems relatively inevitable that this one is not accompanied by modifications or deteriorations of work.

précédent sommaire suivant






Extinction Rebellion







Changeons ce systeme injuste, Soyez votre propre syndic



"Aux âmes bien nées, la valeur n'attend point le nombre des années"   Corneille