WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Libéralisation financière et intermédiation bancaire: le cas de la Côte d'Ivoire

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Fidelia Beugre DAGO
Université de Cocody-Abidjan, UFR Sciences économiques et de Gestion, Programme PTCI - DEA-PTCI 2005
  

précédent sommaire

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

ANNEXES

ANNEXES 3 : résultats des estimations et test de validation

Date: 07/24/05 Time: 13:14

Sample(adjusted): 1972 2003

Included observations: 32 after adjusting endpoints

Trend assumption: No deterministic trend

Series: DBP IPF PRH

Lags interval (in first differences): 1 to 1

 
 
 
 
 

Unrestricted Cointegration Rank Test

Hypothesized

 

Trace

5 Percent

1 Percent

No. of CE(s)

Eigenvalue

Statistic

Critical Value

Critical Value

None

0.260778

11.14384

24.31

29.75

At most 1

0.044681

1.474834

12.53

16.31

At most 2

0.000379

0.012115

3.84

6.51

*(**) denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 5%(1%) level

Trace test indicates no cointegration at both 5% and 1% levels

 
 
 
 
 

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/21/05 Time: 11:46

Sample(adjusted): 1975 2002

Included observations: 28 after adjusting endpoints

Convergence achieved after 15 iterations

Newey-West HAC Standard Errors & Covariance (lag truncation=3)

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

D(LOG(IPF))

0.107282

0.050923

2.106730

0.0494

D(LOG(PRH))

0.002161

0.077636

0.027840

0.9781

TCRE

-2.075139

0.539634

-3.845454

0.0012

C

0.181314

0.042870

4.229432

0.0005

INFL

-2.348638

0.598107

-3.926787

0.0010

D(LOG(PRH(-1)))

0.208895

0.049707

4.202540

0.0005

D(LOG(IPF(-1)))

-0.060772

0.032468

-1.871765

0.0776

AR(1)

-1.046933

0.136297

-7.681241

0.0000

AR(2)

-0.993087

0.235064

-4.224747

0.0005

AR(3)

-0.619111

0.265611

-2.330890

0.0316

R-squared

0.602178

Mean dependent var

0.010650

Adjusted R-squared

0.403268

S.D. dependent var

0.245088

S.E. of regression

0.189327

Akaike info criterion

-0.218228

Sum squared resid

0.645205

Schwarz criterion

0.257559

Log likelihood

13.05520

F-statistic

3.027379

Durbin-Watson stat

2.039324

Prob(F-statistic)

0.021746

Inverted AR Roots

-.13 -.88i

-.13+.88i

-.79

White Heteroskedasticity Test:

F-statistic

0.549261

Probability

0.849503

Obs*R-squared

8.547569

Probability

0.741011

 
 
 
 
 

Test Equation:

Dependent Variable: RESID^2

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/26/05 Time: 10:50

Sample: 1975 2002

Included observations: 28

Newey-West HAC Standard Errors & Covariance (lag truncation=3)

Date: 07/24/05 Time: 13:39

Sample(adjusted): 1972 2003

Included observations: 32 after adjusting endpoints

Trend assumption: No deterministic trend

Series: FB CRI INSTA IPF PRH

Lags interval (in first differences): 1 to 1

 
 
 
 
 

Unrestricted Cointegration Rank Test

Hypothesized

 

Trace

5 Percent

1 Percent

No. of CE(s)

Eigenvalue

Statistic

Critical Value

Critical Value

None

0.422889

42.61377

59.46

66.52

At most 1

0.303502

25.02272

39.89

45.58

At most 2

0.285725

13.44863

24.31

29.75

At most 3

0.080271

2.681056

12.53

16.31

At most 4

0.000107

0.003421

3.84

6.51

*(**) denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 5%(1%) level

Trace test indicates no cointegration at both 5% and 1% levels

 
 
 
 
 

Dependent Variable: D(LOG(FB))

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/07/05 Time: 19:15

Sample(adjusted): 1993 2003

Included observations: 11 after adjusting endpoints

Convergence achieved after 12 iterations

Newey-West HAC Standard Errors & Covariance (lag truncation=2)

Variable

Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

LOG(INSTA)

-0.047331

0.008102

-5.841781

0.0281

D(LOG(IPF))

-0.062008

0.004956

-12.51219

0.0063

D(LOG(PRH))

-0.663499

0.089027

-7.452776

0.0175

D(LOG(CRI))

0.022462

0.002617

8.581704

0.0133

TDRE

0.514929

0.044019

11.69778

0.0072

C

-0.114341

0.005520

-20.71316

0.0023

AR(3)

-0.119872

0.034805

-3.444102

0.0749

AR(1)

-1.544709

0.073251

-21.08794

0.0022

AR(2)

-0.858790

0.103917

-8.264228

0.0143

R-squared

0.999630

Mean dependent var

-0.076426

Adjusted R-squared

0.998149

S.D. dependent var

0.086877

S.E. of regression

0.003738

Akaike info criterion

-8.409076

Sum squared resid

2.79E-05

Schwarz criterion

-8.083525

Log likelihood

55.24992

F-statistic

675.0753

Durbin-Watson stat

1.868593

Prob(F-statistic)

0.001480

Inverted AR Roots

-.21

-.67+.37i

-.67 -.37i

White Heteroskedasticity Test:

F-statistic

4.134383

Probability

0.365372

Obs*R-squared

10.71211

Probability

0.295959

 
 
 
 
 

Test Equation:

Dependent Variable: RESID^2

Method: Least Squares

Date: 07/26/05 Time: 10:53

Sample: 1993 2003

Included observations: 11

Newey-West HAC Standard Errors & Covariance (lag truncation=2)

précédent sommaire






Extinction Rebellion







Changeons ce systeme injuste, Soyez votre propre syndic



"En amour, en art, en politique, il faut nous arranger pour que notre légèreté pèse lourd dans la balance."   Sacha Guitry