3.5 Sampling technique
All participants have been selected from Kibagabaga Hospital.
systematic random sampling was used to sample the
discordant couples who tested for HIV, and all of them had an equal chance to
participate in the study.
Inclusion criteria:
- Couples affected by HIV discordance: The
study included couples where one partner is HIV-positive (index case) and the
other is HIV-negative.
- Residence in Gasabo District: Participants
must reside within the Gasabo District to ensure the study's focus on this
specific urban setting.
- Willingness to participate: Couples who
expressed willingness to participate in the study through informed consent
processes.
20
- Age criteria: Depending on study
objectives, specific age ranges (e.g., 18-49 years) may be included to capture
relevant age-related dynamics.
Exclusion criteria:
- Non-consenting couples: Couples who do not
provide informed consent to participate in the study.
- Couples not meeting discordance criteria:
Couples where both partners are HIV-positive or both partners are
HIV-negative would be excluded.
- Residence outside Gasabo District: Couples
residing outside Gasabo District would not be included to maintain geographical
focus.
These criteria are essential for ensuring the study's
relevance and integrity, focusing on the specific population of interest and
enabling researchers to draw meaningful conclusions about HIV discordance
within the targeted urban context of Gasabo district.
3.8 Data Analysis
This analysis plan was structured to meticulously investigate
the impacts of socio-demographic, behavioral, clinical, psychosocial, and
relationship factors on HIV outcomes. The process started with rigorous data
cleaning to address missing data, outliers, and inconsistencies. Descriptive
analysis followed, providing a detailed understanding of the dataset through
frequency distributions, summary statistics, and visualizations of social
demographics variables. In addition, Bivariate analysis identified significant
associations between each variable and HIV status using chi-squared tests where
statistical significance was measured at p-value <0.05. The study culminated
in multivariate logistic regression models that assessed the combined effects
of significant predictors while adjusting for confounders. The study reported
adjusted odds Ratio, 95% CI, and p-value.
3.9 Ethical-considerations
A clearance letter turned into-received from the ethical
research Committee of the college of Rwanda faculty of Public fitness.
Permission become sought from the Gasabo district by way of providing the
clearance letter from the faculty to get records from Kibagabaga clinic.
informed consent become requested from all the research participants using an
informed consent form signed with the aid of each participant. individuals who
felt uncomfortable have been allowed to withdraw at any moment throughout the
records series system without any penalty. information
21
changed into treated with utmost confidentiality the use of
numbers as opposed to names and confined get entry to to data by
non-researchers.
CHAPTER 4: RESULTS
4.1. The sociodemographic characteristics
Table 1 illustrates the socio-demographic characteristics of a
population of 254 individuals, highlighting distinct trends across various
demographic markers. In gender distribution, males are predominantly
represented with 165 (65%) compared to females who account for 89 (35%). The
age group 26-35 years comprises the largest segment at 71 (28%), emphasizing a
younger adult population. Educationally, the highest completion is at the
university level with 71 (28%), showing a significant presence of higher
education within the group. Occupation-wise, salaried positions lead at 58
(22.8%), reflecting a substantial portion of the population in formal
employment. Religious affiliations are diverse, with Catholics being the most
prevalent at 69 (27.2%). (see table 1)
Table 1: Socio-demographic characteristics
(N=254)
|
Variable(s)
|
Number(n)
|
Percentage (%)
|
|
Gender
|
|
|
|
Female
|
89
|
35
|
|
Male
|
165
|
65
|
|
Age in years
|
|
|
|
18-25
|
68
|
26.8
|
|
26-35
|
71
|
28
|
|
36-45
|
52
|
20.5
|
|
>45
|
63
|
24.8
|
|
Education
|
|
|
|
A'level
|
56
|
22
|
|
O'level
|
57
|
22.4
|
|
Primary school
|
70
|
27.6
|
|
University level
|
71
|
28
|
|
Occupation
|
|
|
|
Business
|
41
|
16.1
|
|
Casual labor
|
44
|
17.3
|
|
Driver
|
36
|
14.2
|
|
Motorist
|
38
|
15
|
22
No occupation
|
37
|
14.6
|
|
Salaried
|
58
|
22.8
|
|
Religion
|
|
|
|
Adventist
|
43
|
16.9
|
|
Catholic
|
69
|
27.2
|
|
Muslim
|
47
|
18.5
|
|
Other
|
51
|
20.1
|
|
Protestant
|
44
|
17.3
|
HIV infection prevalence from 2020 up to 2024
Figure 2 shows the HIV Prevalence among discordant couples, in
2020 it was 18.1%, while in 2021 was 13.4%, in 2022 was 31.5%, in 2023 was
23.6% and in 2024 was 13.4%.
45
40
40
35 31.5
30
30
25 23 23.6
Frequency(n)
20 18.1 17 17 Percentage(%)
15 13.4 13.4
10
5
0
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Figure 2: shows HIV infection prevalence among
discordant couple
4.2. Bivariate analysis of socio-demographic
characteristics and HIV infection among discordant couples
The bivariate analysis of socio-demographic characteristics
and HIV infection among discordant couples highlights two significant
associations. First, age appears to play a critical role in infection rates,
particularly among those over 45 years, where 41 individuals (65.1%, p-value =
0.0052) tested positive, suggesting a higher vulnerability to HIV infection.
Secondly, occupation, specifically for
23
drivers, is associated with a markedly higher rate of HIV
positivity, with 25 drivers (69.4%, p-value = 0.0167) being infected. (See
table 2)
Table 2: shows the socio-demographic
characteristics and HIV infection among discordant
|
couples
|
|
|
|
|
|
HIV Status
|
|
|
Negative
|
Positive
|
|
Variable(s)
|
No(row%)
|
No(row%)
|
P-Value
|
|
Gender
|
|
|
0.895
|
|
Female
|
44(49.4)
|
45(50.6)
|
|
|
Male
|
83(50.3)
|
82(49.7)
|
|
|
Age in years
|
|
|
0.0052
|
|
18-25
|
37(54.4)
|
31(45.6)
|
|
|
26-35
|
40(56.3)
|
31(43.7)
|
|
|
36-45
|
28(53.8)
|
24(46.2)
|
|
|
>45
|
22(34.9)
|
41(65.1)
|
|
|
Education
|
|
|
0.547
|
|
A'level
|
25(44.6)
|
31(55.4)
|
|
|
O'level
|
26(45.6)
|
31(54.4)
|
|
|
Primary school
|
39(55.7)
|
31(44.3)
|
|
|
University level
|
37(52.1)
|
34(47.9)
|
|
|
Occupation
|
|
|
0.0167
|
|
Business
|
25(61)
|
16(39)
|
|
|
Casual labor
|
24(54.5)
|
20(45.5)
|
|
|
Driver
|
11(30.6)
|
25(69.4)
|
|
|
Motorist
|
19(50)
|
19(50)
|
|
|
No occupation
|
19(51.4)
|
18(48.6)
|
|
|
Salaried
|
29(50)
|
29(50)
|
|
|
Religion
|
|
|
0.254
|
24
Adventist
|
25(58.1)
|
18(41.9)
|
|
Catholic
|
30(43.5)
|
39(56.5)
|
|
Muslim
|
19(40.4)
|
28(59.6)
|
|
Other
|
28(54.9)
|
23(45.1)
|
|
Protestant
|
25(56.8)
|
19(43.2)
|
4.3. Primary characteristics and HIV infection among
discordant couples
Table 3 provides a detailed exploration of primary
characteristics and their correlation with HIV infection among discordant
couples, highlighting several significant associations. Notably, engaging in
transactional sex shows a marginally significant correlation with HIV
positivity, with 39 individuals (51.3%, p-value = 0.0471) being positive,
suggesting the potential risk associated with such behavior. A more pronounced
risk is observed among those with multiple sex partners, where those without
multiple partners exhibit a higher infection rate of 75 (57.3%, p-value =
0.017), underscoring the importance of limiting sexual partners in reducing HIV
transmission. Additionally, a diagnosis with STIs also correlates with a higher
HIV infection rate, with 77 positive cases (53.5%, p-value = 0.0205),
highlighting the critical link between STI management and HIV risk reduction.
Furthermore, relationship type emerges as a significant factor; individuals in
monogamous relationships have an unexpectedly higher rate of HIV infection, at
67 (55.4%, p-value = 0.0102), indicating that even monogamous setups among
discordant couples carry substantial transmission risks. (See Table 3)
Table 3:shows the primary characteristics and HIV
infection among discordant couples
|
|
HIV Status
|
|
|
Negative
|
Positive
|
|
Variable(s)
|
No(row%)
|
No(row%)
|
P-Value
|
|
Transactional Sex
|
|
|
0.0471
|
|
Always
|
37(48.7)
|
39(51.3)
|
|
|
Condom use
|
30(50.8)
|
29(49.2)
|
|
|
Never
|
29(44.6)
|
36(55.4)
|
|
|
Sometimes
|
31(57.4)
|
23(42.6)
|
|
|
Multiple Sex
|
|
|
0.017
|
25
Partners
|
|
|
|
|
No
|
56(42.7)
|
75(57.3)
|
|
|
Yes
|
71(57.7)
|
52(42.3)
|
|
|
Sex Under
|
|
|
|
|
Influence
|
|
|
0.706
|
|
No
|
68(51.1)
|
65(48.9)
|
|
|
Yes
|
59(48.8)
|
62(51.2)
|
|
|
Diagnosis with
|
|
|
|
|
STIs
|
|
|
0.0205
|
|
No
|
60(54.5)
|
50(45.5)
|
|
|
Yes
|
67(46.5)
|
77(53.5)
|
|
|
Attended PrEP and PEP
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
No
|
68(52.7)
|
61(47.3)
|
|
|
Yes
|
59(47.2)
|
66(52.8)
|
|
|
Access to HIV
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
0.166
|
|
No
|
74(54)
|
63(46)
|
|
|
Yes
|
53(45.3)
|
64(54.7)
|
|
|
HIV-related
|
|
|
|
|
Stigma
|
|
|
0.802
|
|
No
|
64(49.2)
|
66(50.8)
|
|
|
Yes
|
63(50.8)
|
61(49.2)
|
|
|
HIV Status Communication
|
|
0.954
|
|
Not discussed at all
|
25(50)
|
25(50)
|
|
|
Open and frequent
|
30(54.5)
|
25(45.5)
|
|
|
Rarely discussed
|
27(49.1)
|
28(50.9)
|
|
|
Somewhat open
|
23(46.9)
|
26(53.1)
|
|
|
partner
|
22(48.9)
|
23(51.1)
|
|
|
Depression Due to HIV Status
|
|
0.98
|
|
Always
|
28(50.9)
|
27(49.1)
|
|
|
Never
|
33(50.8)
|
32(49.2)
|
|
|
Rarely
|
32(47.8)
|
35(52.2)
|
|
26
Sometimes Relationship
|
34(50.7)
|
33(49.3)
|
|
|
Length
|
|
|
0.765
|
|
1 to 2 years
|
32(51.6)
|
30(48.4)
|
|
|
6 months to 1 year
|
36(50.7)
|
35(49.3)
|
|
|
Less than 6 months
|
27(44.3)
|
34(55.7)
|
|
|
More than 2 years
|
32(53.3)
|
28(46.7)
|
|
|
Relationship Type
|
|
|
0.0102
|
|
Casual
|
73(54.9)
|
60(45.1)
|
|
|
Monogamous
|
54(44.6)
|
67(55.4)
|
|
|
Relationship Satisfaction
|
|
|
0.0523
|
|
Neutral
|
65(47.1)
|
73(52.9)
|
|
|
Very satisfied
|
62(53.4)
|
54(46.6)
|
|
4.4. Logistic regression of the associated risk
factors of HIV infection among the discordant couples
Table four presents a logistic regression analysis of hazard
factors for HIV infection among discordant couples, that specialize in adjusted
odds ratios (AOR) and their significance. significantly, people over forty five
years antique exhibit significantly higher odds of infection, with an AOR of
2.37 (95% CI: 1.10-five.12, p-price = 0.027), highlighting age as a essential
issue in HIV susceptibility. similarly, drivers face a markedly multiplied
danger, with an AOR of 4.seventy seven (ninety five% CI: 1.seventy
one-thirteen.31, p-price = zero.003), pointing to occupational risks that
contribute to HIV risks. moreover, having multiple sex partners drastically
elevates HIV contamination odds, with an AOR of 1.67 (95% CI: 1.31-2.88,
p-price = 0.016). (see table four)
27
Table 4: Logistic regression of the associated risk
factors of HIV infection among the discordant couples
|
HIV Outcome
|
COR (95%CI)
|
P-value
|
AOR (95%CI)
|
P-Value
|
|
Age in years
|
|
|
|
|
|
18-25
|
1.00
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
26-35
|
1.83(1.35,1.90)
|
0.018*
|
0.93(0.45,1.90)
|
0.85
|
|
36-45
|
1.12(0.47,2.31)
|
0.909
|
1.02(0.47,2.21)
|
0.949
|
|
>45
|
2.37(1.12,6.12)
|
0.033*
|
2.37(1.10,5.12)
|
0.027*
|
|
Occupation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
|
1.00
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
Casual labor
|
1.37(0.59,3.65)
|
0.299
|
1.47(0.59,3.65)
|
0.399
|
|
Driver
|
4.03(1.71,13.01)
|
0.013*
|
4.77(1.71,13.31)
|
0.003*
|
|
Motorist
|
2.22(0.82,5.42)
|
0.123
|
2.12(0.82,5.52)
|
0.12
|
|
No occupation
|
1.37(0.61,4.17)
|
0.357
|
1.57(0.61,4.07)
|
0.347
|
|
Salaried
|
2.63(0.85,5.76)
|
0.179
|
2.03(0.85,4.86)
|
0.109
|
|
Transactional sex
|
|
|
|
|
|
Never
|
1.35(0.61,2.55)
|
0.635
|
1.25(0.61,2.56)
|
0.535
|
|
Sometimes
|
1.68(1.32,1.83)
|
0.0314*
|
0.68(0.32,1.43)
|
0.314
|
|
Condom use
|
1.02(0.49,2.11)
|
0.945
|
1.02(0.49,2.11)
|
0.945
|
|
Always
|
1.00
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
Having multiple sex partners
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
1.52(1.31,1.88)
|
0.006
|
1.67(1.31,2.88)
|
0.016
|
|
No
|
1.00
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
Diagnosis with STIs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes
|
0.49(0.06,0.59)
|
0.0148
|
1.49(0.86,2.59)
|
0.148
|
|
No
|
1.00
|
|
1.00
|
|
|
Relationship type
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monogamous
|
1.57(1.11,2.69)
|
0.009
|
1.57(0.91,2.69)
|
0.098
|
|
Casual
|
1.00
|
|
1.00
|
|
Relationship satisfaction
Very satisfied 1.72(1.42,1.62) 0.022
0.72(0.42,1.22) 0.224
Neutral 1.00 1.00
28
COR: Crude odds Ratio, AOR:
Adjusted Odds ratio
29
CHAPTER 5. DISCUSSION
This take a look at aimed to evaluate the superiority of HIV
contamination amongst discordant couples who examined HIV repute at Kibagabaga
health facility over a length from 2020 to 2024. The statistics discovered a
noteworthy increase in the share of HIV-positive individuals many of the
couples, highlighting a critical shift within the HIV contamination dynamics
inside this population. further analysis confirmed that the following factors
are key predictors of HIV infection amongst discordant couples: multiple sexual
partners, age of greater than forty five years, and driver profession.
have a look at findings showed that having multiple sexual
partners become a ability hazard aspect for HIV infection among discordant
couples. these findings are similar with different research like the examine
conducted. studies which include Dunkle et al. (2008) and the partners in
Prevention HSV/HIV Transmission have a look at team (2010) display that more
than one partnerships make bigger the risk of HIV transmission thru multiplied
publicity possibilities, which includes to drug-resistant virus traces. those
findings are regular across specific regions, including sub-Saharan Africa,
where a meta-evaluation by means of Mah and Halperin (2010) underscores the
correlation among more than one concurrent partnerships and better HIV
infection costs. moreover, psychological and social dynamics additionally play
a critical function, as visible in research with the aid of Chai et al. (2014)
in China, which factors to the want for culturally tailored interventions to
deal with those elements effectively. Prevention techniques highlighted by
Allen and Meinzen-Derr (2000) emphasize the importance of lowering the range of
sexual partners and continually the usage of condoms to mitigate transmission
risks among discordant couples.
Our findings found out that couples with ages extra than forty
five years had been are threat of HIV infection. but, these consequences and
constant with different findings. The findings that couples over the age of 45
are at risk of HIV contamination might first of all seem unexpected however are
well-supported by using the literature, reflecting a broader fashion in public
fitness knowledge that HIV chance is not restrained to younger individuals by
myself. research inclusive of that conducted by Brooks et al. (2016) highlights
that older adults have interaction in hazard behaviors similar to younger
populations however are regularly neglected in preventive interventions.
organic and behavioral adjustments with age, which include decreased condom use
and changes in sexual characteristic, make a contribution to improved threat.
furthermore, socio-
30
economic elements may also lead older adults to form
relationships with more youthful partners, probably altering risk dynamics.
research by way of Schick et al. (2014) and Zablotska et al. (2018)
additionally emphasize that older adults are much less in all likelihood to be
tested for HIV because of healthcare vendors' assumptions approximately their
sexual pastime, that may put off diagnosis and remedy. This convergence of
things underscores the want for healthcare techniques that emphasize education,
testing, and prevention tailor-made to all age corporations, as echoed in
comparative research like the ones with the aid of Skolnik et al. (2019),
reinforcing the significance of addressing HIV danger across various
populations and age brackets.
have a look at findings showed that couples wherein one of
them became a driving force showed a more risk of HIV infection and this is
steady with other research. The commentary that couples in which one associate
is a driving force are at an expanded hazard of HIV infection is supported by
severa research that check out the precise occupational dangers associated with
mobile jobs. for example, drivers regularly spend long periods away from
domestic, that can lead to engagement in high-danger sexual behaviors, together
with interactions with commercial sex workers, as mentioned in research like
those through Delany-Moretlwe et al. (2010). This transient lifestyle also can
result in social isolation, further increasing the probability of seeking
companionship in dangerous contexts. moreover, Lichtenstein (2015) highlights
that truck drivers are specially vulnerable due to their common exposure to
environments wherein casual sex is greater commonplace. Comparative studies
throughout regions, which includes the examine by means of Ramjee and Gouws
(2017), confirms higher prices of HIV amongst drivers, emphasizing the want for
focused intervention techniques
|