WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

Design of a geographic information supported database for the management of pressurised irrigation systems at the plantation du Haut Penja, Cameroon

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Chick Herman AZAH
University of Dschang - Agric engineer 2009
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

3.6 Evaluation of the Functioning of the Network

One of the five irrigation networks was considered in this study for analysis. Analysis of the network was done by dividing the network into various branches and taking into consideration the number of hydrants which are opened upstream during irrigation. Hydraulic calculations were done based on the formulas proposed by Zoungrana (2002) while heads losses were calculated using the Hazem-William equation. Microsoft Excel software was used for the hydraulic analysis.

3.6.1 Calculation of flow rates

If (en m3/h) is the nominal flow rate of one big gun, n the number of opened big guns upstream and (m3/h) the flow rate from the extremity of the downstream branch,

the flow rate entering the upstream branch, (m3/h) is given by the formula:

(3.1)

The flow rate leaving the downstream branch is calculated by respecting the loop rule of networks which is derived from the principle of conservation of matter as:

? Flow entering = flow leaving (3.2)

Given that the network functions both in the transport and distribution of water, the hydrants have almost equal flow rates. The flow rate which results in the same head loss

4 ? Q

? otherwise known as the fictitious or simulated flow rate,

? ?

? 10 ? 3600

D ? (m3/h), was calculated by the

formula presented by Zoungrana (2002):

(3.3)

3.6.2 Calculation of flow velocity and head losses.

Given that the flow rate in the conduits follows steady state conditions for the same pipe diameters (i.e. the velocity in the fluid is the same in both magnitude and direction at a given instant and in at every point in the fluid), the flow velocity was calculated by applying the formula:

(3.4)

Where:

= Flow velocity (m/s)

= Flow rate considered (m3/h)

= internal diameter of the conduit (mm)

Also the velocity of flow in water supply conduits is always less than or equal to 1.5m/s so knowing the diameter of the conduits, the velocity of flow could be generated.

, but

Head losses were being calculated using the Hazem-William equation

(3.5)

Where,

Linear head losses (m)

L= length of given branch (m)

Q= fictitious flow rate (lps)

C=150 for plastic pipes and 120 for steel pipes D= internal diameter of pipe (mm)

Singular head losses due to T`s, bends, valves and elbows which are difficult to calculate are estimated to be 10%

(3.6)

Total Head Losses, J, in a given branch is the sum of the linear and singular head

losses

(3.7)

The ratio of this head loss on the length of a given branch gives us the unit head losses given by:

(3.8)

Where,

j = unit head loss (m/m)

L = length of branch (m)

J = head loss in a given branch (m)

3.6.3 Determination of available and required pressures

At the level of each hydrant, the available pressures and the required pressures were calculated as follows:

(3.9)

Where,

available pressure upstream (m)

available pressure downstream (m)

upstream piezometric elevation (m)

downstream piezometric elevation (m) = head loss in a given branch (m)

The required pressure downstream equals zero, if the number of big guns at the

??

downstream hydrant equals zero or equal to the required pressure upstream if the number of big guns at the downstream hydrant is different from zero.

The pressures available upstream used in our calculations are those of the technical slip of the principal conduits of PHP, version 2 of 16/02/01.

These calculations were done taking into consideration the canon or the plot with the worst case (i.e. the furthest big gun on relatively flat ground or the most elevated or both). The other systems such as the microjet and undertree systems were been converted into the equivalent number of big guns. This is because this system sets the ground base for the conversion to other systems.

For undertree irrigation systems, the pressure required at the entry of a lateral is given by the formula proposed by Azenkot (1999), considering that the terrain is relatively flat.

hu = hs + 3/4F + r (3.10)

Where,

hu = pressure required at the entry of the lateral (m) hs = nominal pressure of sprinkler (m)

F = correction factor

= linear head loss in the lateral (m)

r = height above the ground of the sprinkler (m)

The pressure required at the center of the primary conduit is calculated in the same way as that of the laterals and is given by:

hr = hu +3/4(Fr ) (3.11)

Where,

hr = required pressure at the centre of the lateral (m) Fr = correction coefficient of the lateral

= head losses in the lateral (m)

? P avn ? Z av

The pressure available at the entry of the secondary conduit or hydrant is given by equation 3.2:

= hr + + Zp - z (3.12)

Where,

= pressure required at the hydrant (m)

= head losses in the secondary conduit (m)

Zp = geometric elevation of the hydrant

z = geometric elevation of the plot with the worst case (m)

For irrigation plots totally covered by big guns, the required pressure is calculated as above, the only exception being that the correction factor is considered to be unity (1).

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Il faut répondre au mal par la rectitude, au bien par le bien."   Confucius