WOW !! MUCH LOVE ! SO WORLD PEACE !
Fond bitcoin pour l'amélioration du site: 1memzGeKS7CB3ECNkzSn2qHwxU6NZoJ8o
  Dogecoin (tips/pourboires): DCLoo9Dd4qECqpMLurdgGnaoqbftj16Nvp


Home | Publier un mémoire | Une page au hasard

 > 

La mobilisation de la démarche judiciaire dans le processus de justice transitionnelle en sociétés post-conflit: le cas du Rwanda

( Télécharger le fichier original )
par Claudette Chancelle Marie-Paule BILAMPASSI MOUTSATSI
Université protestante d'Afrique Centrale - Master II en paix et développement 2012
  

précédent sommaire suivant

Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy

ABSTRACT

This study entitled mobilisation of the judicial procedure in the transitional justice process in post-conflict societies: the case study of Rwanda, aims at demonstrating how the judicial procedure is mobilised in the transitional justice process. It makes an analysis of the institutions involved in transitional justice in Rwanda, exposes its breakthroughs and bottlenecks, and finally makes some recommendations in order to strengthen the transitional justice institutions. In fact, Rwanda used transitional justice mechanisms, inspired by international criminal law and African tradition, in a bid to find solutions to the traumatic situations where serious crimes had been perpetrated. Our goal in this study is to find out whether the transitional justice institutions really contributed to consolidate and ensure sustainable peace in Rwanda. We used the functionalist theory as well as socio-historic, legal and holistic approaches. In the first part of the study entitled «The judicial institution in action in the Rwanda post-genocide context», we first analysed the judicial procedure in the transitional justice process at the national level. We laid emphasis on the genocide and the creation of the transitional justice institutions thereof. We further analysed the classic jurisdictions and the Gacaca jurisdictions, which are transitional justice institutions at the national level. Thereafter, we analysed the mobilisation of the international judicial approach through the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) notably, its contribution to the fight against impunity. The second part of the study focused on the «mixed results of the judicial procedure in the transitional justice process in Rwanda». Through the right to guarantees of non-repetition: support to the restoration and building of rule of law, reconciliation, promotion of inclusive governance and reform of security sector, we brought out the way the judicial procedure in the transitional justice process significantly contributed to the promotion of peace consolidation: building of human rights and promotion of reconciliation in Rwanda. Secondly, the study analysed the perfectible contribution to the peace dynamic of the judicial procedure in the transitional justice process. We laid emphasis on the obstacles that hinder the smooth achievement of transitional justice. At the end of the analyses, it appears that transitional justice is very important for Rwanda in the sense that it punishes the criminals but also establishes sustainable peace by revealing the truth on the events that happened and by enabling reconciliation among the societies divided and traumatised by human right abuses and violations during a conflict or genocide. Through the Gacaca jurisdictions, Rwanda constitutes a model of community involvement in the administration of international criminal justice. Even though the Gacaca have not been quite efficient, countries which are to manage a difficult past may thereof draw their inspiration. This mechanism would produce good results, provided it is not instrumented by political authorities nor distorted, notably by assigning it a complex mandate which goes beyond its capacities. In fact, the mandate of the Gacaca jurisdictions is noteworthy both in quality and quantity despite some bottlenecks. The Gacaca are the most efficient and dynamic initiatives launched after the genocide for justice and reconciliation. At the end of this study, it is also worth mentioning that in spite of the difficulties of the international criminal system during its creation, the ICTR is a key instrument in the international legal acknowledgment of the genocide perpetrated against Tutsis. In a nutshell, in spite of the imperfections of the ICTR and the Gacaca tribunals, it can be said and underlined that an effort towards justice has been made in Rwanda, which led to the edification of a society more respectful of the law; In spite of some imperfections, quite little actually, we strongly emphasized that transitional justice is a main contribution to peace and post-conflict reconstruction in Rwanda history.

précédent sommaire suivant






Bitcoin is a swarm of cyber hornets serving the goddess of wisdom, feeding on the fire of truth, exponentially growing ever smarter, faster, and stronger behind a wall of encrypted energy








"Là où il n'y a pas d'espoir, nous devons l'inventer"   Albert Camus