ABSTRACT
From the foundation of Economic and Monetary
Community of the States of Central Africa on June 25 1999, the states members
and fixed a common objective to build a competitive and challenge market. The
finance of these markets appears as a deep solution, in order to mobilize
savings that will serve for development and some projects in high benefit of
the sub region.
But, this noble objective can tap a stock market delinquent.
This situation tasks on issue of the protection of the persons that invest
their money. Then, the investor victim of this type of infraction into the
central Africa zone has a lot of resorts for soaking sustain damage punishing
its actor.
Like this, the compensation, traditional mean at the benefit
of the victims becomes ineffective in the regard of the conditions elaborated.
A crow down by a judge in this matter is used to resolve this ineffectiveness.
This ineffectiveness is explained by the weakness of the sanctions reserved in
this domain. Event this situation is persisting, the victims have another
resorts to the competent authorities; the control of the financial markets,
that can reach to compensation and judicial punishment. Despite the importance
of these measures, the competent organs are not independent, then it power
becomes limited.
Finally, we can say that the investor is abandoned; in the
regard of the judicial frame which doesn't protect him effectively. The sub
regional integration and commentary law are considered as solution tolls in
central Africa but are largely limited by the principle of sovereignty. In
conclusion, the investor is not fully protected in this system.
SOMMAIRE
AVERTISSEMENT :
Erreur ! Signet non
défini.
DEDICACE :
ii
REMERCIEMENTS :
iii
RESUME
iv
ABSTRACT
v
SOMMAIRE
vi
LISTE DES ABREVIATIONS
vii
INTRODUCTION GENERALE
1
TITRE
I : L'INSUFFISANCE DE LA REPARATION POUR LA PROTECTION DIRECTE DE
L'INVESTISSEUR VICTIME D'UNE INFRACTION BOURSIE EN ZONE CEMAC
13
CHAPITRE 1 : LA COMPLEXITE DES CONDITIONS
LEGALES DU DROIT A REPARATION DU PREJUDICE DE L' INVESTISSEUR VICTIME D'UNE
INFRACTION BOURSIERE EN ZONE CEMAC
16
SECTION 1 : L'EXIGENCE D'UN PREJUCICE,
CONDITION D'ACCES AU DROIT A REPARATION POUR UN INVESTISSEUR VICTIME D'UNE
INFRACTION BOURSIERE EN ZONE CEMAC.
16
SECTION 2 : L'EXIGENCE D'UNE FAUTE ET D'UN
LIEN DE CAUSALITE
34
2. LA CRITIQUE DU RECOURS A LA PERTE DE
CHANCE DANS LA DETERMINATION DU LIEN DE CAUSALITE
50
CHAPITRE 2 : LA COMPLEXITE DES CONDITIONS
LEGALES FORMELLES DU DROIT A REPARATION DU PREJUDICE DE L'INVESTISSEUR VICTIME
D'UNE INFRACTION BOURSIERE EN ZONE CEMAC
52
SECTION 1 : le RECOURS A LA PROCEDURE
JUDICIAIRE DE REPARATION DU PREJUDICE BOURSIER DE L'INVESTISSEUR EN ZONE
CEMAC
52
SECTION 2 : LA PROCEDURE DE REPARATION DU
PREJUDICE BOURSIER DEVANT L'AUTORITE ADMINISTRATIVE DE CONTROLE DU MARCHE
63
CONCLUSION TITRE 1
73
TITRE
2 : L'INSUFFISANCE DE LA REPRESSION POUR LA PROTECTION INDIRECTE DE
L'INVESTISSEUR VICTIME D'UNE INFRACTION BOURSIERE EN ZONE CEMAC
74
CHAPITRE 1 : LA FAIBLESSE DE LA REPRESSION
PENALE, UN OBSTACLE A LA PROTECTION DE L'INVESTISSEUR VICTIME D'UNE INFRACTION
BOURSIERE EN ZONE CEMAC
76
SECTION 1 : PRESENTATION GENERALE DES
INFRACTIONS BOURSIERES PUNISSABLES EN ZONE CEMAC
76
SECTION 2 : LE CADRE REPRESSIF DES INFRACTIONS
BOURSIERES EN ZONE CEMAC ET SATISAFACTION DES INTERETS DE L'INVESTISSEUR
VICTIME D'UNE INFRACTION BOURSIERE
91
CHAPITRE II : LA FAIBLESSE DE LA REPRESSION
ADMINISTRATIVE, OBSTACLE A LA PROTECTION DE L'INVESTISSEUR VICTIME D'UNE
INFRACTION BOURSIERE EN ZONE CEMAC
99
SECTION 1 : L'EXISTENCE CONTROVERSEE DU
POUVOIR JURIDICTIONNEL DES GENDARMES BOURSIERS EN ZONE CEMAC
99
SECTION 2 : L'EFFICACITE RELATIVE DES
MECANISMES DE LA REPRESSION ADMINISTRATIVE DES DELITS BOURSIERS EN ZONE
CEMAC
105
CONCLUSION DU TITRE 2
110
CONCLUSION GENERALE
111
BIBLIOGRAPHIE
112
TABLE DES MATIERES
119
| 
